From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=K4f4=Q4=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6439C43381
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:45:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D852080F
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:45:11 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="cSXyd/C2"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727859AbfBUNpK (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:45:10 -0500
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:33090 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1725820AbfBUNpK (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:45:10 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch;
        s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:
        Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
        Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
        :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
        List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
        bh=xb95Xg+wzs8PVk/9QV6of01D1xVhPTfSuo0acQQWAVw=; b=cSXyd/C2FW5QAZ6oufpbrVyPop
        nutvqRuoq/Ih4aoC7D5bd8YbEW2LFHSH/m/A3sv+dG+rb1PInPRh39Hcaj31i3Z4QTlDOVA+d7HFi
        B6FgJ/6xMDp67MxKvALGosC04cIOYMc4p+A+4INAg0ZnleYRVmHJq7o2STfxJ018aJFY=;
Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89)
        (envelope-from <andrew@lunn.ch>)
        id 1gwoeu-0002A8-J8; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:45:04 +0100
Date:   Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:45:04 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>
Cc:     Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Add bindings for mdio mux consumers
Message-ID: <20190221134504.GE5653@lunn.ch>
References: <20190221182349.4057-1-pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190221182349.4057-1-pankaj.bansal@nxp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:59:19PM +0000, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> When we use the bindings defined in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux
> to define mdio mux in producer and consumer terms, it results in two
> devices. one is mux producer and other is mux consumer.
> 
> Add the bindings needed for Mdio mux consumer devices.

Hi Pankaj

Please thread this binding patch with the code which implements the
binding. The two should be reviewed together.

Thanks
	Andrew