From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=t95Q=Q5=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9F3C43381
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AF620645
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:20 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="lbQcqNDU"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727456AbfBVR7T (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:59:19 -0500
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:35024 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726498AbfBVR7T (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:59:19 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch;
        s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:
        Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
        Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
        :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
        List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
        bh=VNIMLPsdfbP83WfAjuBqtnSI89McHe5ljDoMF2Ok5p4=; b=lbQcqNDUsutW1GrUs0C1aUOI3f
        12Di3koChyIyudLjUE5PWg4ppX3NrCyy9E9BhXoui4QOt3Bp5U+SsPdClfP3OWxNJWG6pRHKK9g27
        XHbiDr4Qwspfh6Vihq5zlLVR+kvVOGZ3l1MyUXasS2vn33ZdW6TwVrBLxwlMurL79HDE=;
Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89)
        (envelope-from <andrew@lunn.ch>)
        id 1gxF6S-0001NW-Gf; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:59:16 +0100
Date:   Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:59:16 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add lockdep classes to fix false
 positive splat
Message-ID: <20190222175916.GM5894@lunn.ch>
References: <20190217181143.14817-1-andrew@lunn.ch>
 <20190217195524.rhc4rsvzsalptyua@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <20190222174856.tmisqn7ih3ea3xvz@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190222174856.tmisqn7ih3ea3xvz@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Do we have a way forward for this issue?

Hi Russell

Yes. I tested releasing the mutex around the request for the
interrupt. That works. So i will submit a patchset adding both the
lockdep class, and the unlock/lock pair.

	Andrew