From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7353C43381 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EE520651 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:22:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1550956954; bh=Dd20qACvaWufKC4gklibljd/3VqSRbzW9jSKEZkAjR0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:List-ID:From; b=DvqulzFZ4WwYaeW2VA/GXCr6QnWof5RLevw21KbSUyRR8kk6FWKv1exNsYqBnKTYC wXqYBEIhCK3JTbM78oscISCyWA5pHrECfMs6EpYmLgsSqtleiCh5+h94wyuZnhKOfa N2ZLYTs8ywADA8KcynR5juGZspehRNw78rywMoyY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729308AbfBWVIk (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Feb 2019 16:08:40 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44078 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728714AbfBWVIi (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Feb 2019 16:08:38 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A46320855; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:08:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1550956117; bh=Dd20qACvaWufKC4gklibljd/3VqSRbzW9jSKEZkAjR0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=xzX1NC+U/Gqr0aivgTqliE1hxD3xRZ90VTdIdqOJdfowEdBXj0xWb0s2hJ0XdFLxi tvVw1fYjYSnD5XASzajCLCSUzJBV9gzwqPsvav5bLeVDxs4JIEGTeObPNWN9ZD/J0Y Wkhizdu0NkaYHnXS9BiObpfC218UxiOW0NZhI/PM= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Su Yanjun , Steffen Klassert , Sasha Levin , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 01/45] vti4: Fix a ipip packet processing bug in 'IPCOMP' virtual tunnel Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 16:07:51 -0500 Message-Id: <20190223210835.201708-1-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Su Yanjun [ Upstream commit dd9ee3444014e8f28c0eefc9fffc9ac9c5248c12 ] Recently we run a network test over ipcomp virtual tunnel.We find that if a ipv4 packet needs fragment, then the peer can't receive it. We deep into the code and find that when packet need fragment the smaller fragment will be encapsulated by ipip not ipcomp. So when the ipip packet goes into xfrm, it's skb->dev is not properly set. The ipv4 reassembly code always set skb'dev to the last fragment's dev. After ipv4 defrag processing, when the kernel rp_filter parameter is set, the skb will be drop by -EXDEV error. This patch adds compatible support for the ipip process in ipcomp virtual tunnel. Signed-off-by: Su Yanjun Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/ipv4/ip_vti.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c index 00d4371d45736..306603a7f3514 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c @@ -74,6 +74,33 @@ static int vti_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, return 0; } +static int vti_input_ipip(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, + int encap_type) +{ + struct ip_tunnel *tunnel; + const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb); + struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev); + struct ip_tunnel_net *itn = net_generic(net, vti_net_id); + + tunnel = ip_tunnel_lookup(itn, skb->dev->ifindex, TUNNEL_NO_KEY, + iph->saddr, iph->daddr, 0); + if (tunnel) { + if (!xfrm4_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb)) + goto drop; + + XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4 = tunnel; + + skb->dev = tunnel->dev; + + return xfrm_input(skb, nexthdr, spi, encap_type); + } + + return -EINVAL; +drop: + kfree_skb(skb); + return 0; +} + static int vti_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) { XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->family = AF_INET; @@ -82,6 +109,14 @@ static int vti_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) return vti_input(skb, ip_hdr(skb)->protocol, 0, 0); } +static int vti_rcv_ipip(struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->family = AF_INET; + XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->daddroff = offsetof(struct iphdr, daddr); + + return vti_input_ipip(skb, ip_hdr(skb)->protocol, ip_hdr(skb)->saddr, 0); +} + static int vti_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err) { unsigned short family; @@ -439,6 +474,12 @@ static struct xfrm4_protocol vti_ipcomp4_protocol __read_mostly = { .priority = 100, }; +static struct xfrm_tunnel ipip_handler __read_mostly = { + .handler = vti_rcv_ipip, + .err_handler = vti4_err, + .priority = 0, +}; + static int __net_init vti_init_net(struct net *net) { int err; @@ -607,6 +648,13 @@ static int __init vti_init(void) if (err < 0) goto xfrm_proto_comp_failed; + msg = "ipip tunnel"; + err = xfrm4_tunnel_register(&ipip_handler, AF_INET); + if (err < 0) { + pr_info("%s: cant't register tunnel\n",__func__); + goto xfrm_tunnel_failed; + } + msg = "netlink interface"; err = rtnl_link_register(&vti_link_ops); if (err < 0) @@ -616,6 +664,8 @@ static int __init vti_init(void) rtnl_link_failed: xfrm4_protocol_deregister(&vti_ipcomp4_protocol, IPPROTO_COMP); +xfrm_tunnel_failed: + xfrm4_tunnel_deregister(&ipip_handler, AF_INET); xfrm_proto_comp_failed: xfrm4_protocol_deregister(&vti_ah4_protocol, IPPROTO_AH); xfrm_proto_ah_failed: -- 2.19.1