Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Leslie Monis <lesliemonis@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Mohit P . Tahiliani" <tahiliani@nitk.edu.in>,
	Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] net: sched: pie: align PIE implementation with RFC 8033
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:50:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190226075057.1e76bba7@shemminger-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190226082046.GA2266@Inspiron-3521>

On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:50:46 +0530
Leslie Monis <lesliemonis@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 04:38:11PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:39:54 +0530
> > Leslie Monis <lesliemonis@gmail.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > The current implementation of the PIE queuing discipline is according to the
> > > IETF draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00] and the paper
> > > [PIE: A Lightweight Control Scheme to Address the Bufferbloat Problem].
> > > However, a lot of necessary modifications and enhancements have been proposed
> > > in RFC 8033, which have not yet been incorporated in the source code of Linux.
> > > This patch series helps in achieving the same.
> > > 
> > > Performance tests carried out using Flent [https://flent.org/]
> > > 
> > > Changes from v2 to v3:
> > >   - Used div_u64() instead of direct division after explicit type casting as
> > >     recommended by David
> > > 
> > > Changes from v1 to v2:
> > >   - Excluded the patch setting PIE dynamically active/inactive as the test
> > >     results were unsatisfactory
> > >   - Fixed a scaling issue when adding more auto-tuning cases which caused
> > >     local variables to underflow
> > >   - Changed the long if/else chain to a loop as suggested by Stephen
> > >   - Changed the position of the accu_prob variable in the pie_vars
> > >     structure as recommended by Stephen
> > > 
> > > Mohit P. Tahiliani (7):
> > >   net: sched: pie: change value of QUEUE_THRESHOLD
> > >   net: sched: pie: change default value of pie_params->target
> > >   net: sched: pie: change default value of pie_params->tupdate
> > >   net: sched: pie: change initial value of pie_vars->burst_time
> > >   net: sched: pie: add more cases to auto-tune alpha and beta
> > >   net: sched: pie: add derandomization mechanism
> > >   net: sched: pie: update references
> > > 
> > >  include/uapi/linux/pkt_sched.h |   2 +-
> > >  net/sched/sch_pie.c            | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > >  2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)  
> > 
> > Are you concerned at all that changes to default values might change
> > expected behavior of existing users?  
> 
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> As Dave mentioned, the changes which we have made do not really change the
> behaviour of the aqm drastically. Our performance tests show that these changes
> improve performance without any side-effects. So existing users (if there are
> any) should not be negatively affected in any way.

Thanks for answering. Looks good

      reply	other threads:[~2019-02-26 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-25 19:09 [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] net: sched: pie: align PIE implementation with RFC 8033 Leslie Monis
2019-02-25 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/7] net: sched: pie: change value of QUEUE_THRESHOLD Leslie Monis
2019-02-25 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] net: sched: pie: change default value of pie_params->target Leslie Monis
2019-02-25 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/7] net: sched: pie: change default value of pie_params->tupdate Leslie Monis
2019-02-25 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/7] net: sched: pie: change initial value of pie_vars->burst_time Leslie Monis
2019-02-25 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/7] net: sched: pie: add more cases to auto-tune alpha and beta Leslie Monis
2019-02-25 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/7] net: sched: pie: add derandomization mechanism Leslie Monis
2019-02-25 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/7] net: sched: pie: update references Leslie Monis
2019-02-25 22:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] net: sched: pie: align PIE implementation with RFC 8033 David Miller
2019-02-26  0:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-02-26  1:02   ` Dave Taht
2019-02-26  8:20   ` Leslie Monis
2019-02-26 15:50     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190226075057.1e76bba7@shemminger-XPS-13-9360 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=lesliemonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tahiliani@nitk.edu.in \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox