From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, mlxsw@mellanox.com,
idosch@mellanox.com, dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 5/5] net: devlink: remove unused devlink_port_get_phys_port_name() function
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 17:27:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190301162720.GL2314@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190301082529.6d7aee20@cakuba.netronome.com>
Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 05:25:29PM CET, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com wrote:
>On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 09:14:02 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>>
>> Now it is unused, remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>
>Oh, you nuke this completely, that's going to conflict hard with my
>series :)
>
>(Provided the locking is okay) I think it'd be good if we flipped the
>logic in dev_get_phys_port_name(). Always try devlink:
>
>@@ -7872,7 +7873,7 @@ int dev_get_phys_port_name(struct net_device *dev,
> const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops;
>
>+ if (!devlink_compat_phys_port_name_get(dev, name, len))
>+ return 0;
> if (!ops->ndo_get_phys_port_name)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> return ops->ndo_get_phys_port_name(dev, name, len);
> }
>
>NFP is using a single set of NDOs for PFs and VFs (which don't have
>devlink ports), so either it'd be good if I could call the devlink
>helper for real ports, or we need the above.
That wouldn't give correct results now. Until you introduce PF/VF port
flavours, devlink_compat_phys_port_name_get() does not assemble correct
names for them. So we have to call ndo_get_phys_port_name until it knows
how to do that.
>
>> diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
>> index ae2cd34da99e..227c453cc20e 100644
>> --- a/include/net/devlink.h
>> +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>> @@ -578,8 +578,6 @@ void devlink_port_attrs_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>> enum devlink_port_flavour flavour,
>> u32 port_number, bool split,
>> u32 split_subport_number);
>> -int devlink_port_get_phys_port_name(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>> - char *name, size_t len);
>> int devlink_sb_register(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned int sb_index,
>> u32 size, u16 ingress_pools_count,
>> u16 egress_pools_count, u16 ingress_tc_count,
>> @@ -794,13 +792,6 @@ static inline void devlink_port_attrs_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>> {
>> }
>>
>> -static inline int
>> -devlink_port_get_phys_port_name(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>> - char *name, size_t len)
>> -{
>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> -}
>> -
>> static inline int devlink_sb_register(struct devlink *devlink,
>> unsigned int sb_index, u32 size,
>> u16 ingress_pools_count,
>> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
>> index 4fd45d4a4818..d90a745d8258 100644
>> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
>> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>> @@ -5451,13 +5451,6 @@ static int __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -int devlink_port_get_phys_port_name(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>> - char *name, size_t len)
>> -{
>> - return __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(devlink_port, name, len);
>> -}
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_get_phys_port_name);
>> -
>> int devlink_sb_register(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned int sb_index,
>> u32 size, u16 ingress_pools_count,
>> u16 egress_pools_count, u16 ingress_tc_count,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-01 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-01 8:13 [patch net-next 0/5] net: call for phys_port_name into devlink directly is possible Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 8:13 ` [patch net-next 1/5] net: replace ndo_get_devlink for ndo_get_devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 12:45 ` Michal Kubecek
2019-03-01 13:42 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-02 2:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-01 8:13 ` [patch net-next 2/5] net: devlink: introduce devlink_compat_phys_port_name_get() Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 16:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01 16:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 8:14 ` [patch net-next 3/5] mlxsw: spectrum: Implement ndo_get_devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 8:14 ` [patch net-next 4/5] mlxsw: Remove ndo_get_phys_port_name implementation Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 8:14 ` [patch net-next 5/5] net: devlink: remove unused devlink_port_get_phys_port_name() function Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 16:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01 16:27 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2019-03-01 16:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190301162720.GL2314@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=mlxsw@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).