From: Martynas Pumputis <m@lambda.lt>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
mhocko@suse.com, m@lambda.lt, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf] bpf: Try harder when allocating memory for large maps
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:10:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190318151026.21539-1-m@lambda.lt> (raw)
It has been observed that sometimes a higher order memory allocation
for BPF maps fails when there is no obvious memory pressure in a system.
E.g. the map (BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH, key=38, value=56, max_elems=524288)
could not be created due to vmalloc unable to allocate 75497472B,
when the system's memory consumption (in MB) was the following:
Total: 3942 Used: 837 (21.24%) Free: 138 Buffers: 239 Cached: 2727
Later analysis [1] by Michal Hocko showed that the vmalloc was not trying
to reclaim memory from the page cache and was failing prematurely due to
__GFP_NORETRY.
Considering dcda9b0471 ("mm, tree wide: replace __GFP_REPEAT by
__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL with more useful semantic") and [1], we can replace
__GFP_NORETRY with __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL, as it won't invoke OOM killer
and will try harder to fulfil allocation requests.
Unfortunately, replacing the body of the BPF map memory allocation
function with the kvmalloc_node helper function is not an option at this
point in time, given 1) kmalloc is non-optional for higher order
allocations, and 2) passing __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL to the kmalloc would stress
the slab allocator too much for large requests.
The change has been tested with the workloads mentioned above and by
observing oom_kill value from /proc/vmstat.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20190310071318.GW5232@dhcp22.suse.cz/
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis <m@lambda.lt>
---
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 62f6bced3a3c..afca36f53c49 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -136,21 +136,29 @@ static struct bpf_map *find_and_alloc_map(union bpf_attr *attr)
void *bpf_map_area_alloc(size_t size, int numa_node)
{
- /* We definitely need __GFP_NORETRY, so OOM killer doesn't
- * trigger under memory pressure as we really just want to
- * fail instead.
+ /* We really just want to fail instead of triggering OOM killer
+ * under memory pressure, therefore we set __GFP_NORETRY to kmalloc,
+ * which is used for lower order allocation requests.
+ *
+ * It has been observed that higher order allocation requests done by
+ * vmalloc with __GFP_NORETRY being set might fail due to not trying
+ * to reclaim memory from the page cache, thus we set
+ * __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL to avoid such situations.
*/
- const gfp_t flags = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_ZERO;
+
+ const gfp_t flags = __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO;
void *area;
if (size <= (PAGE_SIZE << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)) {
- area = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_USER | flags, numa_node);
+ area = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NORETRY | flags,
+ numa_node);
if (area != NULL)
return area;
}
- return __vmalloc_node_flags_caller(size, numa_node, GFP_KERNEL | flags,
- __builtin_return_address(0));
+ return __vmalloc_node_flags_caller(size, numa_node,
+ GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
+ flags, __builtin_return_address(0));
}
void bpf_map_area_free(void *area)
--
2.21.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-18 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-18 15:10 Martynas Pumputis [this message]
2019-03-18 15:39 ` [PATCH v3 bpf] bpf: Try harder when allocating memory for large maps Michal Hocko
2019-03-18 15:52 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190318151026.21539-1-m@lambda.lt \
--to=m@lambda.lt \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).