From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C55C43381 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8AB206C0 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 04:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="mLxvMJ0s" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726175AbfCZEN7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:13:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com ([209.85.210.195]:41749 "EHLO mail-pf1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725298AbfCZEN7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:13:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 188so2015656pfd.8 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:13:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4dYN99vZnqDPn6DkGW6HM2kCTdqMm2Fb2wXeGQe/1u4=; b=mLxvMJ0sBzT4NiDOLNtIH5g3i6NBdmtsVP7HzFI5MrILZGhAJaJ4GWIe167gmyQArj eSkoNpM/eOr5I5bvqezwZvDHta3xV1v4twIkefGUy6tWxdZ1SGhSFwn/xxVKQ9R6XJXA dfDxt4DoGDJrzSlsIoy9vrD9sGlJOy7EfKyGfCOlwHGXphZvQPYJXtk6sZCuacsSIYVi MaWvrXJjsZYrqxPLKqGCCdokn5SG/+XdYh6831bRhjqzNBXUedyIPzMpKQknQ9hRidtH K5JJouwMkcpFb1Tp1y38RIwVd+YNbkXciJ/4l0sGHTJPEo8Xs8CBqvD3/iCqpsIF8hRj Ncsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4dYN99vZnqDPn6DkGW6HM2kCTdqMm2Fb2wXeGQe/1u4=; b=mYdqikJbcenZVLDvEQ9kqgW9E3JrOBMitNVDElRIqRDIC8b5YFkDb6W2l8M7fXYEY8 wyxbQOewsP4L97dtgip2QmSqRc6+W7aBpVQ1/WG+yFnva5aveQww670rUas8ZfBI1xhC bzTE5qeNIjGSK4gD6lkWa6itTgUZzjs0fBUi9ANSEmDLp3U8C3Uwb7iQzG27BElyVjrn xCvNKL5gEkSNyOHIa0UI5sf5HZZmQLgSFWZqF8SyTVLEQAIXNnQCUHbE68nKv2b0BmPe /ESBkcJeJSch5si/1gbIXo31NqL/oeREEOvbmMD9lucxoRvDoxqk36GygHEbqF3KRTAf xrug== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVGL0MHFwW7eme3KP7psjeAgyQ3OhObBkAvnuXHl4Z7ofW7O64g SESe0Q6IuUviqT/a94ckcHU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwvES9h1jx3u51LrdE5XSdG1VTixsFvaH0Lo3KbnqOq+l6SU76msJSfqDsVJvxdWVfSL+2Dcw== X-Received: by 2002:a65:64c3:: with SMTP id t3mr26646307pgv.14.1553573638482; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (c-73-222-71-142.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.222.71.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a13sm19284084pgw.91.2019.03.25.21.13.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:13:55 -0700 From: Richard Cochran To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 01/13] lib: Add support for generic packing operations Message-ID: <20190326041355.75amdwt6yqnvcmlq@localhost> References: <20190324032346.32394-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <20190324032346.32394-2-olteanv@gmail.com> <20190324190226.jr5cqxqflkfn4uvl@localhost> <3cd07aa5-02b0-c539-83f9-215d631dc1da@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3cd07aa5-02b0-c539-83f9-215d631dc1da@gmail.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:32:03PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > I didn't want to pollute LKML with the entire driver patchset from the > get-go, just receive some initial feedback from netdev first (hence the > RFC). > How should I proceed? Should I resend just this patch to LKML, or a v2 > patchset with LKML copied on the lib patch? I would send the entire series, so that the context is clear. (There is no danger of polluting lkml ;^) Thanks, Richard