From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, mlxsw@mellanox.com,
idosch@mellanox.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
vivien.didelot@gmail.com, michael.chan@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 11/12] net: devlink: expose phys port name
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 08:45:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190327074538.GA3111@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190326133558.40d5ff0e@cakuba.netronome.com>
Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:35:58PM CET, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:03:06 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>>
>> Currently, it is exposed via rtnetlink. But it is relevant to devlink
>> ports, so expose it here too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>
>Why? User space has access to all the components which are used to
>generate the name in a typed, structured form. That's strictly
Nope. It does has access only to flavour. Not to port number for
example. So I thought either expose that or the generated name.
>superior to the string netdev string.
>
>Do you have some use in mind for the new attribute?
>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>> index 5bb4ea67d84f..2d0365e45141 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
>> @@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ enum devlink_attr {
>> DEVLINK_ATTR_FLASH_UPDATE_FILE_NAME, /* string */
>> DEVLINK_ATTR_FLASH_UPDATE_COMPONENT, /* string */
>>
>> + DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PHYS_NAME, /* string */
>> +
>> /* add new attributes above here, update the policy in devlink.c */
>>
>> __DEVLINK_ATTR_MAX,
>> diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
>> index 6bbd07e3861e..356d7ee7c404 100644
>> --- a/net/core/devlink.c
>> +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>> @@ -508,6 +508,57 @@ static void devlink_notify(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_command cmd)
>> msg, 0, DEVLINK_MCGRP_CONFIG, GFP_KERNEL);
>> }
>>
>> +static int __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>> + char *name, size_t len)
>> +{
>> + struct devlink_port_attrs *attrs = &devlink_port->attrs;
>> + int n = 0;
>> +
>> + if (!attrs->set)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + switch (attrs->flavour) {
>> + case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL:
>> + if (!attrs->split)
>> + n = snprintf(name, len, "p%u", attrs->port_number);
>> + else
>> + n = snprintf(name, len, "p%us%u", attrs->port_number,
>> + attrs->split_subport_number);
>> + break;
>> + case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_CPU:
>> + case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_DSA:
>> + /* As CPU and DSA ports do not have a netdevice associated
>> + * case should not ever happen.
>> + */
>> + WARN_ON(1);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (n >= len)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int devlink_nl_port_phys_port_name_put(struct sk_buff *msg,
>> + struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
>> +{
>> + struct devlink_port_attrs *attrs = &devlink_port->attrs;
>> + char phys_name[IFNAMSIZ];
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (attrs->flavour != DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + err = __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(devlink_port,
>> + phys_name, sizeof(phys_name));
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> + if (nla_put_string(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_PHYS_NAME, phys_name))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int devlink_nl_port_attrs_put(struct sk_buff *msg,
>> struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
>> {
>> @@ -526,6 +577,9 @@ static int devlink_nl_port_attrs_put(struct sk_buff *msg,
>> if (nla_put_u32(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_PORT_SPLIT_SUBPORT_NUMBER,
>> attrs->split_subport_number))
>> return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + if (devlink_nl_port_phys_port_name_put(msg, devlink_port))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -5414,38 +5468,6 @@ void devlink_port_attrs_set(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_attrs_set);
>>
>> -static int __devlink_port_phys_port_name_get(struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
>> - char *name, size_t len)
>> -{
>> - struct devlink_port_attrs *attrs = &devlink_port->attrs;
>> - int n = 0;
>> -
>> - if (!attrs->set)
>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> -
>> - switch (attrs->flavour) {
>> - case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL:
>> - if (!attrs->split)
>> - n = snprintf(name, len, "p%u", attrs->port_number);
>> - else
>> - n = snprintf(name, len, "p%us%u", attrs->port_number,
>> - attrs->split_subport_number);
>> - break;
>> - case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_CPU:
>> - case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_DSA:
>> - /* As CPU and DSA ports do not have a netdevice associated
>> - * case should not ever happen.
>> - */
>> - WARN_ON(1);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (n >= len)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> int devlink_sb_register(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned int sb_index,
>> u32 size, u16 ingress_pools_count,
>> u16 egress_pools_count, u16 ingress_tc_count,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-27 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-26 12:02 [patch net-next v2 00/12] net: call for phys_port_name into devlink directly if possible Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 12:02 ` [patch net-next v2 01/12] net: replace ndo_get_devlink with ndo_get_devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 20:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-27 7:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 12:02 ` [patch net-next v2 02/12] net: devlink: introduce devlink_compat_phys_port_name_get() Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 20:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-26 12:02 ` [patch net-next v2 03/12] mlxsw: Implement ndo_get_devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 12:02 ` [patch net-next v2 04/12] mlxsw: Remove ndo_get_phys_port_name implementation Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 12:03 ` [patch net-next v2 05/12] net: devlink: remove unused devlink_port_get_phys_port_name() function Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 20:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-26 12:03 ` [patch net-next v2 06/12] bnxt: implement ndo_get_devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 12:03 ` [patch net-next v2 07/12] bnxt: remove ndo_get_phys_port_name implementation Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 12:03 ` [patch net-next v2 08/12] dsa: implement ndo_get_devlink_port Jiri Pirko
2019-03-27 19:54 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-27 20:01 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-27 20:13 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-03-27 23:46 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 12:03 ` [patch net-next v2 09/12] dsa: don't fill-up remove ndo_get_phys_port_name for slaves Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 12:03 ` [patch net-next v2 10/12] nfp: do not handle nn->port defined case in nfp_net_get_phys_port_name() Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 20:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-26 12:03 ` [patch net-next v2 11/12] net: devlink: expose phys port name Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 20:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-27 7:45 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2019-03-27 11:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 12:03 ` [patch net-next v2 12/12] net: devlink: add warning for ndo_get_phys_port_name set when not needed Jiri Pirko
2019-03-26 20:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190327074538.GA3111@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=mlxsw@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).