From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>,
Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rdma-next 10/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move SMI caps logic
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:27:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190328132742.12070-11-leon@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190328132742.12070-1-leon@kernel.org>
From: Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>
We store the SMI information in the core device's struct, make sure
we set that information only once (and not per port), while here make
the for loop based on the actual size of the array.
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <markb@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
index 9ce8ae5565a3..7eca3978c50c 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
@@ -4534,7 +4534,7 @@ static int set_has_smi_cap(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev)
int err;
int port;
- for (port = 1; port <= dev->num_ports; port++) {
+ for (port = 1; port <= ARRAY_SIZE(dev->mdev->port_caps); port++) {
dev->mdev->port_caps[port - 1].has_smi = false;
if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, port_type) ==
MLX5_CAP_PORT_TYPE_IB) {
@@ -4580,10 +4580,6 @@ static int get_port_caps(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, u8 port)
if (!dprops)
goto out;
- err = set_has_smi_cap(dev);
- if (err)
- goto out;
-
err = mlx5_ib_query_device(&dev->ib_dev, dprops, &uhw);
if (err) {
mlx5_ib_warn(dev, "query_device failed %d\n", err);
@@ -5960,6 +5956,10 @@ int mlx5_ib_stage_init_init(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev)
if (err)
return err;
+ err = set_has_smi_cap(dev);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
if (!mlx5_core_mp_enabled(mdev)) {
for (i = 1; i <= dev->num_ports; i++) {
err = get_port_caps(dev, i);
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-28 13:27 [PATCH rdma-next 00/12] Move IB representors to single IB device multiple ports Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 01/12] net/mlx5: E-Switch, don't use hardcoded values for FDB prios Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 02/12] net/mlx5: E-Switch, add a new prio to be used by the RDMA side Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 03/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move netdev info into the port struct Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 04/12] RDMA/mlx5: Free IB device on remove Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 05/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move ports allocation to outside of INIT stage Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 06/12] RDMA/mlx5: Use correct size for device resources Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 07/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move rep into port struct Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 08/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move default representors SQ steering to rule to modify QP Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 09/12] RDMA/mlx5: Refactor netdev affinity code Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 11/12] RDMA/mlx5: Move to single device multiport ports in switchdev mode Leon Romanovsky
2019-03-28 13:27 ` [PATCH rdma-next 12/12] RDMA/mlx5: Remove VF representor profile Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-04 13:02 ` [PATCH rdma-next 00/12] Move IB representors to single IB device multiple ports Jason Gunthorpe
2019-04-04 17:42 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-10 6:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-10 18:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190328132742.12070-11-leon@kernel.org \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maorg@mellanox.com \
--cc=markb@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).