From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, idosch@mellanox.com,
jiri@mellanox.com, saeedm@mellanox.com,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 13/13] net: Use common nexthop init and release helpers
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:50:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190328155027.rm6zfeece7wlhn2i@ast-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190328035358.4929-14-dsahern@kernel.org>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 08:53:58PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
>
> With fib_nh_common in place, move common initialization and release
> code into helpers used by both ipv4 and ipv6. For the moment, the init
> is just the lwt encap and the release is both the netdev reference and
> the the lwt state reference. More will be added later.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/ip_fib.h | 4 ++++
> net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> net/ipv6/route.c | 21 ++++-------------
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/ip_fib.h b/include/net/ip_fib.h
> index 70548b1a6322..12a6d759cf57 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip_fib.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip_fib.h
> @@ -441,6 +441,10 @@ int fib_nh_init(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *fib_nh,
> struct fib_config *cfg, int nh_weight,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> void fib_nh_release(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *fib_nh);
> +int fib_nh_common_init(struct fib_nh_common *nhc, struct nlattr *fc_encap,
> + u16 fc_encap_type, void *cfg, gfp_t gfp_flags,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> +void fib_nh_common_release(struct fib_nh_common *nhc);
>
> /* Exported by fib_trie.c */
> void fib_trie_init(void);
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> index e9992407863e..df777af7e278 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> @@ -204,16 +204,22 @@ static void rt_fibinfo_free_cpus(struct rtable __rcu * __percpu *rtp)
> free_percpu(rtp);
> }
>
> +void fib_nh_common_release(struct fib_nh_common *nhc)
> +{
> + if (nhc->nhc_dev)
> + dev_put(nhc->nhc_dev);
> +
> + lwtstate_put(nhc->nhc_lwtstate);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fib_nh_common_release);
> +
> void fib_nh_release(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *fib_nh)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_CLASSID
> if (fib_nh->nh_tclassid)
> net->ipv4.fib_num_tclassid_users--;
> #endif
> - if (fib_nh->fib_nh_dev)
> - dev_put(fib_nh->fib_nh_dev);
> -
> - lwtstate_put(fib_nh->fib_nh_lws);
> + fib_nh_common_release(&fib_nh->nh_common);
> free_nh_exceptions(fib_nh);
> rt_fibinfo_free_cpus(fib_nh->nh_pcpu_rth_output);
> rt_fibinfo_free(&fib_nh->nh_rth_input);
> @@ -462,6 +468,30 @@ static int fib_detect_death(struct fib_info *fi, int order,
> return 1;
> }
>
> +int fib_nh_common_init(struct fib_nh_common *nhc, struct nlattr *encap,
> + u16 encap_type, void *cfg, gfp_t gfp_flags,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + if (encap) {
> + struct lwtunnel_state *lwtstate;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (encap_type == LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_NONE) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "LWT encap type not specified");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + err = lwtunnel_build_state(encap_type, encap, nhc->nhc_family,
> + cfg, &lwtstate, extack);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + nhc->nhc_lwtstate = lwtstate_get(lwtstate);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fib_nh_common_init);
> +
> int fib_nh_init(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *nh,
> struct fib_config *cfg, int nh_weight,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> @@ -474,22 +504,10 @@ int fib_nh_init(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *nh,
> if (!nh->nh_pcpu_rth_output)
> goto err_out;
>
> - if (cfg->fc_encap) {
> - struct lwtunnel_state *lwtstate;
> -
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - if (cfg->fc_encap_type == LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_NONE) {
> - NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "LWT encap type not specified");
> - goto lwt_failure;
> - }
> - err = lwtunnel_build_state(cfg->fc_encap_type,
> - cfg->fc_encap, AF_INET, cfg,
> - &lwtstate, extack);
Init of nhc_family should have been part of this patch instead of previous one,
but it's not a big deal.
patch 5 isn't pretty still and you didn't answer my question
why pointer to fib6_flags is worse than duplicated check.
But it's ok to me in this shape, so for the set:
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-28 3:53 [PATCH v3 net-next 00/13] net: Move fib_nh and fib6_nh to a common struct David Ahern
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 01/13] ipv4: Define fib_get_nhs when CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH is disabled David Ahern
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 02/13] ipv4: Move IN_DEV_IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN to helper David Ahern
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 03/13] ipv4: Create init helper for fib_nh David Ahern
2019-03-28 8:34 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 04/13] ipv4: Create cleanup " David Ahern
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 05/13] ipv6: Create init helper for fib6_nh David Ahern
2019-03-28 11:17 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 06/13] ipv6: Create cleanup " David Ahern
2019-03-28 11:18 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 07/13] ipv6: Move gateway checks to a fib6_nh setting David Ahern
2019-03-28 11:20 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 08/13] ipv6: Refactor fib6_ignore_linkdown David Ahern
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 09/13] ipv6: Change rt6_add_nexthop and rt6_nexthop_info to take fib6_nh David Ahern
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 10/13] ipv4: Rename fib_nh entries David Ahern
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 11/13] ipv6: Rename fib6_nh entries David Ahern
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 12/13] net: Add fib_nh_common and update fib_nh and fib6_nh David Ahern
2019-03-28 11:22 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-03-28 3:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 13/13] net: Use common nexthop init and release helpers David Ahern
2019-03-28 11:23 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-03-28 15:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2019-03-28 18:10 ` David Ahern
2019-03-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 00/13] net: Move fib_nh and fib6_nh to a common struct David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190328155027.rm6zfeece7wlhn2i@ast-mbp \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox