From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
To: <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
<jannh@google.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/10] bpf: improve verification speed by not remarking live_read
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 21:27:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190402042749.3670015-4-ast@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190402042749.3670015-1-ast@kernel.org>
With large verifier speed improvement brought by the previous patch
mark_reg_read() becomes the hottest function during verification.
On a typical program it consumes 40% of cpu.
mark_reg_read() walks parentage chain of registers to mark parents as LIVE_READ.
Once the register is marked there is no need to remark it again in the future.
Hence stop walking the chain once first LIVE_READ is seen.
This optimization drops mark_reg_read() time from 40% of cpu to <1%
and overall 2x improvement of verification speed.
For some programs the longest_mark_read_walk counter improves from ~500 to ~5
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a636db4a7a4e..94cf6efc5df6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1151,6 +1151,15 @@ static int mark_reg_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
parent->var_off.value, parent->off);
return -EFAULT;
}
+ if (parent->live & REG_LIVE_READ)
+ /* The parentage chain never changes and
+ * this parent was already marked as LIVE_READ.
+ * There is no need to keep walking the chain again and
+ * keep re-marking all parents as LIVE_READ.
+ * This case happens when the same register is read
+ * multiple times without writes into it in-between.
+ */
+ break;
/* ... then we depend on parent's value */
parent->live |= REG_LIVE_READ;
state = parent;
--
2.20.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-02 4:27 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/10] bpf: improve verifier scalability Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-02 4:27 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/10] bpf: add verifier stats and log_level bit 2 Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-02 4:27 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/10] bpf: improve verification speed by droping states Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-02 4:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2019-04-02 4:27 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/10] bpf: convert temp arrays to kvcalloc Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-02 4:27 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/10] bpf: verbose jump offset overflow check Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-02 4:27 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/10] bpf: increase complexity limit and maximum program size Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-02 4:27 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/10] bpf: increase verifier log limit Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-02 4:27 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/10] libbpf: teach libbpf about log_level bit 2 Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-02 4:27 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/10] selftests/bpf: add few verifier scale tests Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-02 4:27 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: synthetic tests to push verifier limits Alexei Starovoitov
2019-04-04 0:01 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/10] bpf: improve verifier scalability Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190402042749.3670015-4-ast@kernel.org \
--to=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).