From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next] ravb: Avoid unsupported internal delay mode for R-Car E3/D3
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:12:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190408111252.GB4553@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408094823.24bbzfp63mhzdkaa@verge.net.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1055 bytes --]
^
> > > +static const struct soc_device_attribute ravb_delay_mode_quirk_match[] = {
> > > + { .soc_id = "r8a77990", .revision = "ES1.*" },
> > > + { .soc_id = "r8a77995", .revision = "ES1.*" },
> > > + { /* sentinel */ }
> > > +};
> >
> > I might have missed it but is there a plan to fix this in later
> > revisions of D3/E3? I was under the impression that it is not and then
> > we could base it on compatible rather than soc_device_match?
>
> I am not aware of any such plan (or the absence of such a plan).
>
> I was unsure weather to go with the compat approach of the quirk approach.
> In the end I went with the quirk approach as it seems simpler. But
> I'm happy to re-arrange things.
I see. Well, I don't care super much. The tiny drawback here is that we
will have a potentially broken D3/E3 ES2.0, if they have not fixed TXID
there. Then we need to update the above pattern. So, revision = "*" (or
the compatible approach) might be a tad better. Then we "only" have 1G
disabled for no reason until we whitelist it.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 8:29 [PATCH/RFC net-next] ravb: Avoid unsupported internal delay mode for R-Car E3/D3 Simon Horman
2019-04-08 9:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-08 9:48 ` Simon Horman
2019-04-08 11:12 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2019-04-08 13:02 ` Simon Horman
2019-04-08 13:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-08 17:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-04-08 17:49 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-04-09 10:45 ` Simon Horman
2019-04-09 15:03 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2019-04-10 9:37 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190408111252.GB4553@kunai \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox