From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A831DC10F12 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCFB20835 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:52:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1555473140; bh=2AoyQVgWA7GMSi2oLzWJrSu9d9Ru8xbZpsJd1envo64=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=T7joahi3HBFVGaEBq+4qI0qTqypPzSvAkMjdVo912iEbw2bJ5DWwj4zHmHKjP73ge vFz4KYlInabO0ohHr+WzXi9JVj3RTjWweb7OIMWTOk8R66k5bu+EHrZCb/AFjwdm4a SqtyfvPRULjLyGE2pEl85FlfLyS8g4Tx6jOSklJ4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729630AbfDQDwP (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:52:15 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:35598 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727219AbfDQDwP (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:52:15 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-223-200-170.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.223.200.170]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93DCADA6; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 03:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:52:12 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Mel Gorman Cc: David Rientjes , Vlastimil Babka , "Tobin C. Harding" , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , Tejun Heo , Qian Cai , Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jesper Dangaard Brouer , David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mm: Remove the SLAB allocator Message-Id: <20190416205212.5cb286fbeec801f50269b2b5@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20190412112816.GD18914@techsingularity.net> References: <20190410024714.26607-1-tobin@kernel.org> <20190412112816.GD18914@techsingularity.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:28:16 +0100 Mel Gorman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:53:34PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > > FWIW, our enterprise kernel use it (latest is 4.12 based), and openSUSE > > > kernels as well (with openSUSE Tumbleweed that includes latest > > > kernel.org stables). AFAIK we don't enable SLAB_DEBUG even in general > > > debug kernel flavours as it's just too slow. > > > > > > IIRC last time Mel evaluated switching to SLUB, it wasn't a clear > > > winner, but I'll just CC him for details :) > > > > > > > We also use CONFIG_SLAB and disable CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG for the same reason. > > Would it be possible to re-evaluate using mainline kernel 5.0? I have vague memories that slab outperforms slub for some networking loads. Could the net folks please comment?