From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] macvlan: pass get_ts_info and SIOC[SG]HWTSTAMP ioctl to real device
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 20:59:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190417205958.6508bda2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190417154306.om6rjkxq4hikhsht@localhost>
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:43:06 -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> If NET_ADMIN is enabled in the container, don't the host and container
> contend with each other for the physical interfaces anyhow?
Physical interfaces are not a problem, as each interface can be only in
a single net name space.
The problem here is this patch gives access to physical interface
settings through a virtual interface layered on top of it. Whenever
such thing is done, the virtual interface needs to provide a suitable
way of moderating access to the shared resources, so the individual
virtual interfaces do not affect each other. That's not what's being
done here.
I think this patch is wrong.
Jiri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-17 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-20 2:23 [PATCH net-next] macvlan: pass get_ts_info and SIOC[SG]HWTSTAMP ioctl to real device Hangbin Liu
2019-03-20 18:05 ` David Miller
2019-04-17 8:05 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-04-17 15:43 ` Richard Cochran
2019-04-17 18:59 ` Jiri Benc [this message]
2019-04-18 3:31 ` Richard Cochran
2019-04-18 6:10 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-04-18 8:05 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2019-04-23 4:18 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-04-23 8:31 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2019-04-23 9:15 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-04-23 9:32 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2019-04-25 13:40 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-05-06 7:34 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-05-06 14:01 ` Richard Cochran
2019-05-07 8:35 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2019-05-08 1:41 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-05-08 13:58 ` Michal Kubecek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190417205958.6508bda2@redhat.com \
--to=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=stefan.sorensen@spectralink.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).