From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Feras Daoud <ferasda@mellanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 3/6] RDMA/ucontext: Do not allow BAR mappings to be executable
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 04:01:28 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190418070128.GE3206@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jKH-YwkzEp4UFckabJV_WOTAEQWSZ7787ovhSs215v2+Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 01:30:07AM -0500, Kees Cook wrote:
> Anything running with READ_IMPLIES_EXEC (i.e. a gnu stack marked WITH
> execute) should be considered broken. Now, the trouble is that this
> personality flag is carried across execve(), so if you have a launcher
> that doesn't fix up the personality for children, you'll see this
> spread all over your process tree. What is doing rdma mmap calls with
> an executable stack? That really feels to me like the real source of
> the problem.
Apparently the Fortran runtime forces the READ_IMPLIES_EXEC and
requires it for some real reason or another - Fortran and RDMA go
together in alot of cases.
> Is the file for the driver coming out of /dev? Seems like that should
> be mounted noexec and it would solve this too. (Though now I wonder
> why /dev isn't noexec by default? /dev/pts is noexec...
Yes - maybe?
> Regardless, if you wanted to add a "ignore READ_IMPLIES_EXEC" flag to
> struct file, maybe this bit could be populated by drivers?
This would solve our problem.. How about a flag in struct
file_operations?
Do you agree it is worth drivers banning VM_EXEC for these truely
non-executable pages?
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-18 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-16 11:07 [PATCH rdma-next 0/6] BAR mappings fixes in RDMA Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-16 11:07 ` [PATCH rdma-next 1/6] RDMA/mlx5: Do not allow the user to write to the clock page Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-16 11:07 ` [PATCH rdma-next 2/6] RDMA/mlx5: Use rdma_user_map_io for mapping BAR pages Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-16 11:07 ` [PATCH rdma-next 3/6] RDMA/ucontext: Do not allow BAR mappings to be executable Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-17 19:05 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2019-04-18 5:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-04-18 6:30 ` Kees Cook
2019-04-18 7:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-04-18 7:23 ` Kees Cook
2019-04-22 12:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-04-16 11:07 ` [PATCH rdma-next 4/6] RDMA/ucontext: Fix regression with disassociate Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-16 11:07 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 5/6] RDMA/mlx5: Use get_zeroed_page() for clock_info Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-16 11:07 ` [PATCH rdma-next 6/6] RDMA: Remove rdma_user_mmap_page Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-24 19:24 ` [PATCH rdma-next 0/6] BAR mappings fixes in RDMA Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190418070128.GE3206@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=ferasda@mellanox.com \
--cc=haggaie@mellanox.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).