From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] l2tp: use rcu_dereference_sk_user_data() in l2tp_udp_encap_recv()
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:58:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424095809.GA17274@pc-2.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423164326.108651-1-edumazet@google.com>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 09:43:26AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Canonical way to fetch sk_user_data from an encap_rcv() handler called
> from UDP stack in rcu protected section is to use rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(),
> otherwise compiler might read it multiple times.
>
That reminds me the more general problem we have with ->sk_user_data:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20180117.142538.1972806008716856078.davem@davemloft.net/
We're not even guarateed that ->sk_user_data points to a struct l2tp_tunnel
(some external modules can still probably override it).
There were some locking rules defined for setting ->sk_user_data:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20180124203541.3172-3-tom@quantonium.net/
Converting all users to either avoid using ->sk_user_data or using it
under the proper pre-conditions has been on my TODO list for a while...
I'll try to revive this effort.
> Fixes: d00fa9adc528 ("il2tp: fix races with tunnel socket close")
^
Spurious "i". Vi user? :)
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
> ---
> net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
> index fed6becc5daf86afa2ad9188bb28e151244bb5a6..aee33d1320184e411dbedff72b5bf5199481e53f 100644
> --- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
> +++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
> @@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ int l2tp_udp_encap_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct l2tp_tunnel *tunnel;
>
> - tunnel = l2tp_tunnel(sk);
> + tunnel = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk);
> if (tunnel == NULL)
> goto pass_up;
>
> --
> 2.21.0.593.g511ec345e18-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-23 16:43 [PATCH net] l2tp: use rcu_dereference_sk_user_data() in l2tp_udp_encap_recv() Eric Dumazet
2019-04-24 9:58 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2019-04-24 11:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-04-24 18:21 ` Guillaume Nault
2019-04-24 18:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-04-24 19:04 ` Guillaume Nault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190424095809.GA17274@pc-2.home \
--to=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jchapman@katalix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).