From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@mellanox.com,
john.hurley@netronome.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,RFC 0/9] net: sched: prepare to reuse per-block callbacks from netfilter
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:55:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190426115512.18263215@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190426184145.oioesc7eqy5p7sps@salvia>
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:41:45 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > > >Hence, this emulates the shared blocks available in TC that Jiri made.
> > > > >
> > > > >Note that the list of tcf_block_cb objects will be called to offload
> > > > >policies in this chain.
> > > >
> > > > So you are going to use chain_id (if there is anything like that) as
> > > > block_index during offload, right?
> > >
> > > Yes. But I don't need to expose this chain_index to userspace though,
> > > I can internally allocate it, I only need to make sure it does not
> > > overlap with any of the existing tc block_indexed. I can just use a
> > > different index space which does not overlap with the tc block index
> > > space.
> >
> > How will the association between a block and a device work for
> > netfilter?
>
> My proposal is that Netfilter doesn't need to expose anything similar
> to the TC block concept. I mean, not to the user, not through the
> command line and netlink itself.
Yes, yes.
> If netfilter supports for chain definitions like this:
>
> table x {
> chain y {
> type filter hook ingress devices = { eth0, eth1 } priority 0;
> }
> }
>
> Then the chain 'y' implicitly becomes the block for the 'eth0' and
> 'eth1' devices.
Can there be more chains for those devices? Or those will only run y
from netfilter perspective?
> Note that the above is not yet supported, I need to extend the netlink
> API for this, but having chains that are attached to multiple devices
> is feasible and it makes sense for plain software configurations where
> no offload is involved (as useful as the TC block for pure software to
> avoid policy duplication).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-26 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-26 0:33 [PATCH net-next,RFC 0/9] net: sched: prepare to reuse per-block callbacks from netfilter Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 0:33 ` [PATCH net-next,RFC 1/9] net: sched: move tcf_block_cb before indr_block Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 0:33 ` [PATCH net-next,RFC 2/9] net: sched: add tcf_block_cb_alloc() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 0:33 ` [PATCH net-next,RFC 3/9] net: sched: add tcf_block_cb_free() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 0:33 ` [PATCH net-next,RFC 4/9] net: sched: add tcf_block_setup() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 0:33 ` [PATCH net-next,RFC 5/9] net: sched: add release callback to struct tcf_block_cb Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 0:33 ` [PATCH net-next,RFC 6/9] net: sched: add tcf_setup_block_offload() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 0:33 ` [PATCH net-next,RFC 7/9] net: use tcf_block_setup() infrastructure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 14:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-04-26 16:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 0:33 ` [PATCH net-next,RFC 8/9] net: cls_api: do not expose tcf_block to drivers Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 0:33 ` [PATCH net-next,RFC 8/9] net: sched: remove tcf_block_cb_{register,unregister}() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 0:33 ` [PATCH net-next,RFC 9/9] net: cls_api: do not expose tcf_block to drivers Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 14:32 ` [PATCH net-next,RFC 0/9] net: sched: prepare to reuse per-block callbacks from netfilter Jiri Pirko
2019-04-26 16:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 18:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-26 18:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 18:55 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-04-26 19:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-04-26 19:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190426115512.18263215@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=john.hurley@netronome.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).