From: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
To: daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: ast@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
tglx@linutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bpf, x32: Fix bug for BPF_ALU64 | BPF_NEG
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 10:33:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190428023302.GA29326@udknight> (raw)
The current implementation has two errors:
1: The second xor instruction will clear carry flag which
is necessary for following sbb instruction.
2: The select coding for sbb instruction is wrong, the coding
is "sbb dreg_hi,ecx", but what we need is "sbb ecx,dreg_hi".
This patch rewrites the implementation and fixes the errors.
This patch fixes below errors reported by bpf/test_verifier in x32
platform when the jit is enabled:
"
0: (b4) w1 = 4
1: (b4) w2 = 4
2: (1f) r2 -= r1
3: (4f) r2 |= r1
4: (87) r2 = -r2
5: (c7) r2 s>>= 63
6: (5f) r1 &= r2
7: (bf) r0 = r1
8: (95) exit
processed 9 insns (limit 131072), stack depth 0
0: (b4) w1 = 4
1: (b4) w2 = 4
2: (1f) r2 -= r1
3: (4f) r2 |= r1
4: (87) r2 = -r2
5: (c7) r2 s>>= 63
6: (5f) r1 &= r2
7: (bf) r0 = r1
8: (95) exit
processed 9 insns (limit 131072), stack depth 0
......
Summary: 1189 PASSED, 125 SKIPPED, 15 FAILED
"
Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 19 ++++++-------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 8097b88..b29e82f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -700,19 +700,12 @@ static inline void emit_ia32_neg64(const u8 dst[], bool dstk, u8 **pprog)
STACK_VAR(dst_hi));
}
- /* xor ecx,ecx */
- EMIT2(0x31, add_2reg(0xC0, IA32_ECX, IA32_ECX));
- /* sub dreg_lo,ecx */
- EMIT2(0x2B, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, IA32_ECX));
- /* mov dreg_lo,ecx */
- EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_lo, IA32_ECX));
-
- /* xor ecx,ecx */
- EMIT2(0x31, add_2reg(0xC0, IA32_ECX, IA32_ECX));
- /* sbb dreg_hi,ecx */
- EMIT2(0x19, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, IA32_ECX));
- /* mov dreg_hi,ecx */
- EMIT2(0x89, add_2reg(0xC0, dreg_hi, IA32_ECX));
+ /* neg dreg_lo */
+ EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xD8, dreg_lo));
+ /* adc dreg_hi,0x0 */
+ EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xD0, dreg_hi), 0x00);
+ /* neg dreg_hi */
+ EMIT2(0xF7, add_1reg(0xD8, dreg_hi));
if (dstk) {
/* mov dword ptr [ebp+off],dreg_lo */
--
1.8.5.6.2.g3d8a54e.dirty
next reply other threads:[~2019-04-28 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-28 2:33 Wang YanQing [this message]
2019-05-01 21:43 ` [PATCH] bpf, x32: Fix bug for BPF_ALU64 | BPF_NEG Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190428023302.GA29326@udknight \
--to=udknight@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).