From: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@gmail.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vrf: sit mtu should not be updated when vrf netdev is the link
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 16:28:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190506202848.GA19038@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <667fd9b5-6122-bd9f-e6ae-e08d82197ef9@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 01:54:16PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 5/6/19 1:00 PM, Stephen Suryaputra wrote:
> > VRF netdev mtu isn't typically set and have an mtu of 65536. When the
> > link of a tunnel is set, the tunnel mtu is changed from 1480 to the link
> > mtu minus tunnel header. In the case of VRF netdev is the link, then the
> > tunnel mtu becomes 65516. So, fix it by not setting the tunnel mtu in
> > this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > net/ipv6/sit.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/sit.c b/net/ipv6/sit.c
> > index b2109b74857d..971d60bf9640 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/sit.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/sit.c
> > @@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ static void ipip6_tunnel_bind_dev(struct net_device *dev)
> > if (!tdev && tunnel->parms.link)
> > tdev = __dev_get_by_index(tunnel->net, tunnel->parms.link);
> >
> > - if (tdev) {
> > + if (tdev && !netif_is_l3_master(tdev)) {
> > int t_hlen = tunnel->hlen + sizeof(struct iphdr);
> >
> > dev->hard_header_len = tdev->hard_header_len + sizeof(struct iphdr);
> >
>
> can you explain how tdev is a VRF device? What's the config setup for
> this case?
Hi David,
tdev is set to VRF device per your suggestion to my colleague back in
2017:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg462706.html.
Specifically this on this follow up:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg463287.html
His basic config before your suggestion is available in:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg462770.html
He and I had a refresher discussion this am trying to figure out if tdev
should be a slave device. This is true if the local addr is specified.
In this case the addr has to bound to a slave device. Then the underlay
VRF can be derived from it. But if only remote is specified, then there
isn't a straightforward way to associate the remote with a VRF unless
tdev is set to a VRF device.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-06 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-06 19:00 [PATCH net] vrf: sit mtu should not be updated when vrf netdev is the link Stephen Suryaputra
2019-05-06 19:54 ` David Ahern
2019-05-06 20:28 ` Stephen Suryaputra [this message]
2019-05-06 20:33 ` David Ahern
2019-05-07 19:20 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190506202848.GA19038@ubuntu \
--to=ssuryaextr@gmail.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).