From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: fib_rule_tests: Fix icmp proto with ipv6
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 16:20:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190507082001.GL18865@dhcp-12-139.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dac5b0ed-fa7e-1723-0067-6c607825ec31@gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:00:46PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 4/29/19 8:37 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > An other issue is The IPv4 rule 'from iif' check test failed while IPv6
> > passed. I haven't found out the reason yet.
> >
> > # ip -netns testns rule add from 192.51.100.3 iif dummy0 table 100
> > # ip -netns testns route get 192.51.100.2 from 192.51.100.3 iif dummy0
> > RTNETLINK answers: No route to host
> >
> > TEST: rule4 check: from 192.51.100.3 iif dummy0 [FAIL]
> >
> > # ip -netns testns -6 rule add from 2001:db8:1::3 iif dummy0 table 100
> > # ip -netns testns -6 route get 2001:db8:1::2 from 2001:db8:1::3 iif dummy0
> > 2001:db8:1::2 via 2001:db8:1::2 dev dummy0 table 100 metric 1024 iif dummy0 pref medium
> >
> > TEST: rule6 check: from 2001:db8:1::3 iif dummy0 [ OK ]
>
> use perf to look at the fib lookup parameters:
> perf record -e fib:* -- ip -netns testns route get 192.51.100.2 from
> 192.51.100.3 iif dummy0
> perf script
Hi David, Roopa,
From the perf record the result looks good.
fib_table_lookup could get correct route.
For IPv4:
ip 7155 [001] 8442.915515: fib:fib_table_lookup: table 255 oif 0 iif 2 proto 0 192.51.100.3/0 -> 192.51.100.2/0 tos 0 scope 0 flags 0 ==> dev - gw 0.0.0.0 src 0.0.0.0 err -11
ip 7155 [001] 8442.915517: fib:fib_table_lookup: table 100 oif 0 iif 2 proto 0 192.51.100.3/0 -> 192.51.100.2/0 tos 0 scope 0 flags 0 ==> dev dummy0 gw 192.51.100.2 src 198.51.100.1 err 0
For IPv6:
ip 6950 [000] 759.328850: fib6:fib6_table_lookup: table 255 oif 0 iif 2 proto 0 2001:db8:1::3/0 -> 2001:db8:1::2/0 tos 0 scope 0 flags 0 ==> dev lo gw :: err -113
ip 6950 [000] 759.328852: fib6:fib6_table_lookup: table 100 oif 0 iif 2 proto 0 2001:db8:1::3/0 -> 2001:db8:1::2/0 tos 0 scope 0 flags 0 ==> dev dummy0 gw 2001:db8:1::2 err 0
Then I tracked the code and found in function ip_route_input_slow(),
after fib_lookup(), we got res->type == RTN_UNICAST. So if we haven't
enabled forwarding, it will return -EHOSTUNREACH.
But even we enabled forwarding, we still need to disable rp_filter as the
source/dest address are in the same subnet. The ip_mkroute_input()
-> __mkroute_input() -> fib_validate_source() -> __fib_validate_source() will
return -EXDEV if we enabled rp_filter.
So do you think if we should enable forwarding and disble rp_filter before
test "from $SRC_IP iif $DEV" or just diable this test directly?
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-07 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 17:30 [PATCH net] selftests: fib_rule_tests: Fix icmp proto with ipv6 David Ahern
2019-04-30 2:37 ` Hangbin Liu
2019-04-30 18:00 ` David Ahern
2019-05-07 8:20 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2019-05-08 19:38 ` David Ahern
2019-05-01 15:31 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190507082001.GL18865@dhcp-12-139.nay.redhat.com \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).