From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Question about IRQs during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 06:05:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521055650-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190521094407.ltij4ggbd7xw25ge@steredhat>
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:44:07AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Hi Micheal, Jason,
> as suggested by Stefan, I'm checking if we have some races in the
> virtio-vsock driver. We found some races in the .probe() and .remove()
> with the upper layer (socket) and I'll fix it.
>
> Now my attention is on the bottom layer (virtio device) and my question is:
> during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver (virtio_vsock_remove), could happen
> that an IRQ comes and one of our callback (e.g. virtio_vsock_rx_done()) is
> executed, queueing new works?
>
> I tried to follow the code in both cases (device unplugged or module removed)
> and maybe it couldn't happen because we remove it from bus's knowledge,
> but I'm not sure and your advice would be very helpful.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Stefano
Great question! This should be better documented: patches welcome!
Here's my understanding:
A typical removal flow works like this:
- prevent linux from sending new kick requests to device
and flush such outstanding requests if any
(device can still send notifications to linux)
- call
vi->vdev->config->reset(vi->vdev);
this will flush all device writes and interrupts.
device will not use any more buffers.
previously outstanding callbacks might still be active.
- Then call
vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
to flush outstanding callbacks if any.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-21 9:44 Question about IRQs during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-21 10:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2019-05-21 13:49 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-21 13:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-05-21 14:12 ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-22 3:44 ` Jason Wang
2019-05-23 13:56 ` Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190521055650-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).