netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Question about IRQs during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 06:05:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521055650-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190521094407.ltij4ggbd7xw25ge@steredhat>

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:44:07AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Hi Micheal, Jason,
> as suggested by Stefan, I'm checking if we have some races in the
> virtio-vsock driver. We found some races in the .probe() and .remove()
> with the upper layer (socket) and I'll fix it.
> 
> Now my attention is on the bottom layer (virtio device) and my question is:
> during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver (virtio_vsock_remove), could happen
> that an IRQ comes and one of our callback (e.g. virtio_vsock_rx_done()) is
> executed, queueing new works?
> 
> I tried to follow the code in both cases (device unplugged or module removed)
> and maybe it couldn't happen because we remove it from bus's knowledge,
> but I'm not sure and your advice would be very helpful.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Stefano


Great question! This should be better documented: patches welcome!

Here's my understanding:


A typical removal flow works like this:

- prevent linux from sending new kick requests to device
  and flush such outstanding requests if any
  (device can still send notifications to linux)

- call
          vi->vdev->config->reset(vi->vdev);
  this will flush all device writes and interrupts.
  device will not use any more buffers.
  previously outstanding callbacks might still be active.

- Then call
          vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
  to flush outstanding callbacks if any.

-- 
MST

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-21 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-21  9:44 Question about IRQs during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-21 10:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2019-05-21 13:49   ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-21 13:56     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-05-21 14:12       ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-22  3:44       ` Jason Wang
2019-05-23 13:56         ` Stefano Garzarella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190521055650-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).