Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Question about IRQs during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 15:49:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521134920.pulvy5pqnertbafd@steredhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190521055650-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 06:05:31AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:44:07AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > Hi Micheal, Jason,
> > as suggested by Stefan, I'm checking if we have some races in the
> > virtio-vsock driver. We found some races in the .probe() and .remove()
> > with the upper layer (socket) and I'll fix it.
> > 
> > Now my attention is on the bottom layer (virtio device) and my question is:
> > during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver (virtio_vsock_remove), could happen
> > that an IRQ comes and one of our callback (e.g. virtio_vsock_rx_done()) is
> > executed, queueing new works?
> > 
> > I tried to follow the code in both cases (device unplugged or module removed)
> > and maybe it couldn't happen because we remove it from bus's knowledge,
> > but I'm not sure and your advice would be very helpful.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Stefano
> 
> 
> Great question! This should be better documented: patches welcome!

When I'm clear, I'll be happy to document this.

> 
> Here's my understanding:
> 
> 
> A typical removal flow works like this:
> 
> - prevent linux from sending new kick requests to device
>   and flush such outstanding requests if any
>   (device can still send notifications to linux)
> 
> - call
>           vi->vdev->config->reset(vi->vdev);
>   this will flush all device writes and interrupts.
>   device will not use any more buffers.
>   previously outstanding callbacks might still be active.
> 
> - Then call
>           vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
>   to flush outstanding callbacks if any.

Thanks for sharing these useful information.

So, IIUC between step 1 (e.g. in virtio-vsock we flush all work-queues) and
step 2, new IRQs could happen, and in the virtio-vsock driver new work
will be queued.

In order to handle this case, I'm thinking to add a new variable
'work_enabled' in the struct virtio_vsock, put it to false at the start
of the .remove(), then call synchronize_rcu() before to flush all work
queues and use an helper function virtio_transport_queue_work() to queue
a new work, where the check of work_enabled and the queue_work are in the
RCU read critical section.

Here a pseudo code to explain better the idea:

virtio_vsock_remove() {
    vsock->work_enabled = false;

    /* Wait for other CPUs to finish to queue works */
    synchronize_rcu();

    flush_works();

    vdev->config->reset(vdev);

    ...

    vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
}

virtio_vsock_queue_work(vsock, work) {
    rcu_read_lock();

    if (!vsock->work_enabled) {
        goto out;
    }

    queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, work);

out:
    rcu_read_unlock();
}


Do you think can work?
Please tell me if there is a better way to handle this case.

Thanks,
Stefano

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-21 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-21  9:44 Question about IRQs during the .remove() of virtio-vsock driver Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-21 10:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-05-21 13:49   ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2019-05-21 13:56     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-05-21 14:12       ` Stefano Garzarella
2019-05-22  3:44       ` Jason Wang
2019-05-23 13:56         ` Stefano Garzarella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190521134920.pulvy5pqnertbafd@steredhat \
    --to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox