From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A791EC282E3 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F59921874 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 09:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="A3eoary3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390201AbfEXJlv (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 05:41:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:43027 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389881AbfEXJlv (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 05:41:51 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id l17so889965wrm.10 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 02:41:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=y5N3blBOF57aEuNrqnxupdWMUAa8sEMVdsUI1rflzSQ=; b=A3eoary35mP/ldGozEDAvNCMcz//E5Pp2NMOTYth62qhOZRHuBL/1IULlsfXC0iE9P 2U0gHdxYDJUaj4/6vWvRNMk5HbYNmIhmOG5NAYpgm3RxPw/J/9h8cmhnbF+Cey7mkEbG ccMh7n93p3TomLg1SElpLdEG6psgy5ls35POE7RF/bxByT7tjwKwdXvhdPmpWY0gf3O7 OtZsfHFApGsWlB1Rnobgx9Pxe8YvME0Af3Da4OtTI/6CIJtdOY4QyTRafmL1vqAuDiFa BzxusJ/C1QxGVMQzSZsPcl8j+TmsdyWxL3P+T5qGGixYakACt/r6OdNpNGJAvo2oZI61 SFlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=y5N3blBOF57aEuNrqnxupdWMUAa8sEMVdsUI1rflzSQ=; b=O0ShL5Pfjrjbvp1QoXOjkoxR24Vs2Ko8xA/DyiojPhuQjTzOxKHDtrTqJfAUkAUD1h FQKVe7gn/GgNVT7vAdJzpcdoaUaMBvbQzLlVdRL7dX4+89ieWKjKgiccDywMsL8R5cKD T2FAHM9kmogXCVEXjA5QLhhffEBsCbP5cXIP4pKSv1vAt8qMLjvKX10i94rX/i8850JF ZBctXzvFHWkUArjf/7nd5Qt6J2mmM5OCtKJMJEN90TlftyuR/equw4swGvimEytQDhOP dIda79friDhczbeyrktCD4vEAzRn0WVGjxxT+s9JioC3hk4xyPz0WJobjA377ADQB56L 74OA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWeWTf94t+nOlcxFvfN7qKvXvkTSw4lydEf9hfrmB3Gh2ZIbKCU inusIgvZpqEDlzmAHcAxkGtZBQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPRO4pFpxSPn86THLU1S+1gsKxZpAqGiQDN/sY0wzkykgkTLwXk57Z0fyJ2AQwWnT5Lmk4kQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:aa09:: with SMTP id p9mr9813762wrd.59.1558690909082; Fri, 24 May 2019 02:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apalos (ppp-94-66-229-5.home.otenet.gr. [94.66.229.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o23sm247011wro.13.2019.05.24.02.41.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 May 2019 02:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 12:41:45 +0300 From: Ilias Apalodimas To: Ivan Khoronzhuk Cc: grygorii.strashko@ti.com, hawk@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, ast@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: Add XDP support Message-ID: <20190524094145.GA24675@apalos> References: <20190523182035.9283-1-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190523182035.9283-1-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Ivan, More XDP drivers, that's good! > This patchset add XDP support for TI cpsw driver and base it on > page_pool allocator. It was verified on af_xdp socket drop, > af_xdp l2f, ebpf XDP_DROP, XDP_REDIRECT, XDP_PASS, XDP_TX. > > It was verified with following configs enabled: > CONFIG_JIT=y > CONFIG_BPFILTER=y > CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y > CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS=y > CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS=y > CONFIG_HAVE_EBPF_JIT=y > CONFIG_BPF_JIT=y > CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF=y > > Link on previous RFC: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/17/861 > The recycling pattern has changed i'll have a closer look in the weekend and let you know > Also regular tests with iperf2 were done in order to verify impact on > regular netstack performance, compared with base commit: > https://pastebin.com/JSMT0iZ4 Do you have any XDP related numbers? > > Based on net-next/master > > Ivan Khoronzhuk (3): > net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: add dma mapped submit > net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: return handler status > net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add XDP support > > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 570 +++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_ethtool.c | 55 ++- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.h | 9 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c | 122 +++-- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.h | 6 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_emac.c | 18 +- > 7 files changed, 675 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.17.1 > Thanks /Ilias