From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] devinet: use in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu in more places
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 14:22:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190531122214.18616-4-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190531122214.18616-1-fw@strlen.de>
This also replaces spots that used for_primary_ifa().
for_primary_ifa() aborts the loop on the first secondary address seen.
Replace it with either the rcu or rtnl variant of in_dev_for_each_ifa(),
but two places will now also consider secondary addresses too:
inet_addr_onlink() and inet_ifa_byprefix().
I do not understand why they should ignore secondary addresses.
Why would a secondary address not be considered 'on link'?
When matching a prefix, why ignore a matching secondary address?
Other places get converted as well, but gain "->flags & SECONDARY" check.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
net/ipv4/devinet.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
index 7803a4d2951c..b45421b2b734 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
@@ -327,15 +327,17 @@ static void inetdev_destroy(struct in_device *in_dev)
int inet_addr_onlink(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 a, __be32 b)
{
+ const struct in_ifaddr *ifa;
+
rcu_read_lock();
- for_primary_ifa(in_dev) {
+ in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu(ifa, in_dev) {
if (inet_ifa_match(a, ifa)) {
if (!b || inet_ifa_match(b, ifa)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return 1;
}
}
- } endfor_ifa(in_dev);
+ }
rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
@@ -580,12 +582,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(inetdev_by_index);
struct in_ifaddr *inet_ifa_byprefix(struct in_device *in_dev, __be32 prefix,
__be32 mask)
{
+ struct in_ifaddr *ifa;
+
ASSERT_RTNL();
- for_primary_ifa(in_dev) {
+ in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl(ifa, in_dev) {
if (ifa->ifa_mask == mask && inet_ifa_match(prefix, ifa))
return ifa;
- } endfor_ifa(in_dev);
+ }
return NULL;
}
@@ -1245,17 +1249,22 @@ static int inet_gifconf(struct net_device *dev, char __user *buf, int len, int s
static __be32 in_dev_select_addr(const struct in_device *in_dev,
int scope)
{
- for_primary_ifa(in_dev) {
+ const struct in_ifaddr *ifa;
+
+ in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu(ifa, in_dev) {
+ if (ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY)
+ continue;
if (ifa->ifa_scope != RT_SCOPE_LINK &&
ifa->ifa_scope <= scope)
return ifa->ifa_local;
- } endfor_ifa(in_dev);
+ }
return 0;
}
__be32 inet_select_addr(const struct net_device *dev, __be32 dst, int scope)
{
+ const struct in_ifaddr *ifa;
__be32 addr = 0;
struct in_device *in_dev;
struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
@@ -1266,7 +1275,9 @@ __be32 inet_select_addr(const struct net_device *dev, __be32 dst, int scope)
if (!in_dev)
goto no_in_dev;
- for_primary_ifa(in_dev) {
+ in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu(ifa, in_dev) {
+ if (ifa->ifa_flags & IFA_F_SECONDARY)
+ continue;
if (ifa->ifa_scope > scope)
continue;
if (!dst || inet_ifa_match(dst, ifa)) {
@@ -1275,7 +1286,7 @@ __be32 inet_select_addr(const struct net_device *dev, __be32 dst, int scope)
}
if (!addr)
addr = ifa->ifa_local;
- } endfor_ifa(in_dev);
+ }
if (addr)
goto out_unlock;
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-31 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-31 12:22 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] net: add rcu annotations for ifa_list Florian Westphal
2019-05-31 12:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] afs: do not send list of client addresses Florian Westphal
2019-05-31 15:38 ` David Howells
2019-05-31 16:28 ` Florian Westphal
2019-05-31 12:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] net: inetdevice: provide replacement iterators for in_ifaddr walk Florian Westphal
2019-05-31 12:22 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2019-05-31 12:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] netfilter: use in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu Florian Westphal
2019-05-31 12:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] net: use new in_dev_ifa iterators Florian Westphal
2019-05-31 12:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] drivers: use in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl/rcu Florian Westphal
2019-05-31 12:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/7] net: ipv4: provide __rcu annotation for ifa_list Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190531122214.18616-4-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).