From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEDFC282DD for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3512220665 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389492AbfFJLrP (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 07:47:15 -0400 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:55577 "EHLO relay9-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389421AbfFJLrN (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 07:47:13 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 90.88.159.246 Received: from localhost (aaubervilliers-681-1-40-246.w90-88.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.88.159.246]) (Authenticated sender: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2DA15FF811; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:47:00 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Martin Blumenstingl , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, narmstrong@baylibre.com, khilman@baylibre.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC next v1 0/5] stmmac: honor the GPIO flags for the PHY reset GPIO Message-ID: <20190610114700.tymqzzax334ahtz4@flea> References: <20190609180621.7607-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> <20190609204510.GB8247@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fo7fw3siaxhdftz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190609204510.GB8247@lunn.ch> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org --fo7fw3siaxhdftz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Andrew, On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 10:45:10PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Patch #1 and #4 are minor cleanups which follow the boyscout rule: > > "Always leave the campground cleaner than you found it." > > > I > > am also looking for suggestions how to handle these cross-tree changes > > (patch #2 belongs to the linux-gpio tree, patches #1, 3 and #4 should > > go through the net-next tree. I will re-send patch #5 separately as > > this should go through Kevin's linux-amlogic tree). > > Patches 1 and 4 don't seem to have and dependencies. So i would > suggest splitting them out and submitting them to netdev for merging > independent of the rest. Jumping on the occasion of that series. These properties have been defined to deal with phy reset, while it seems that the PHY core can now handle that pretty easily through generic properties. Wouldn't it make more sense to just move to that generic properties that already deals with the flags properly? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com --fo7fw3siaxhdftz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCXP5DNAAKCRDj7w1vZxhR xa7wAPsFyeyyMzy2Mo76JgsYSYvgpcYRFmoiWzu3x+sgya0khgEAjtxK626tAXRA KJga7pcCDwguE9DoA7ftHh5GzRGyjQo= =h3Ed -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fo7fw3siaxhdftz7--