From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Add test for SO_REUSEPORT_DETACH_BPF
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:59:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190612195917.GB9056@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612190539.2340343-1-kafai@fb.com>
On 06/12, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> This patch adds a test for the new sockopt SO_REUSEPORT_DETACH_BPF.
>
> '-I../../../../usr/include/' is added to the Makefile to get
> the newly added SO_REUSEPORT_DETACH_BPF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 1 +
> .../selftests/bpf/test_select_reuseport.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index 44fb61f4d502..c7370361fa81 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ LLVM_OBJCOPY ?= llvm-objcopy
> LLVM_READELF ?= llvm-readelf
> BTF_PAHOLE ?= pahole
> CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 -I$(APIDIR) -I$(LIBDIR) -I$(BPFDIR) -I$(GENDIR) $(GENFLAGS) -I../../../include \
> + -I../../../../usr/include/ \
Why not copy inlude/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h into tools/include
instead? Will that work?
> -Dbpf_prog_load=bpf_prog_test_load \
> -Dbpf_load_program=bpf_test_load_program
> LDLIBS += -lcap -lelf -lrt -lpthread
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_select_reuseport.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_select_reuseport.c
> index 75646d9b34aa..5aa00b4a4702 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_select_reuseport.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_select_reuseport.c
> @@ -523,6 +523,54 @@ static void test_pass_on_err(int type, sa_family_t family)
> printf("OK\n");
> }
>
> +static void test_detach_bpf(int type, sa_family_t family)
> +{
> + __u32 nr_run_before = 0, nr_run_after = 0, tmp, i;
> + struct epoll_event ev;
> + int cli_fd, err, nev;
> + struct cmd cmd = {};
> + int optvalue = 0;
> +
> + printf("%s: ", __func__);
> + err = setsockopt(sk_fds[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF,
> + &optvalue, sizeof(optvalue));
> + CHECK(err == -1, "setsockopt(SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF)",
> + "err:%d errno:%d\n", err, errno);
> +
> + err = setsockopt(sk_fds[1], SOL_SOCKET, SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF,
> + &optvalue, sizeof(optvalue));
> + CHECK(err == 0 || errno != ENOENT, "setsockopt(SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF)",
> + "err:%d errno:%d\n", err, errno);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_RESULTS; i++) {
> + err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(result_map, &i, &tmp);
> + CHECK(err == -1, "lookup_elem(result_map)",
> + "i:%u err:%d errno:%d\n", i, err, errno);
> + nr_run_before += tmp;
> + }
> +
> + cli_fd = send_data(type, family, &cmd, sizeof(cmd), PASS);
> + nev = epoll_wait(epfd, &ev, 1, 5);
> + CHECK(nev <= 0, "nev <= 0",
> + "nev:%d expected:1 type:%d family:%d data:(0, 0)\n",
> + nev, type, family);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_RESULTS; i++) {
> + err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(result_map, &i, &tmp);
> + CHECK(err == -1, "lookup_elem(result_map)",
> + "i:%u err:%d errno:%d\n", i, err, errno);
> + nr_run_after += tmp;
> + }
> +
> + CHECK(nr_run_before != nr_run_after,
> + "nr_run_before != nr_run_after",
> + "nr_run_before:%u nr_run_after:%u\n",
> + nr_run_before, nr_run_after);
> +
> + printf("OK\n");
> + close(cli_fd);
> +}
> +
> static void prepare_sk_fds(int type, sa_family_t family, bool inany)
> {
> const int first = REUSEPORT_ARRAY_SIZE - 1;
> @@ -664,6 +712,8 @@ static void test_all(void)
> test_pass(type, family);
> test_syncookie(type, family);
> test_pass_on_err(type, family);
> + /* Must be the last test */
> + test_detach_bpf(type, family);
>
> cleanup_per_test();
> printf("\n");
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 19:05 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: net: Detach BPF prog from reuseport sk Martin KaFai Lau
2019-06-12 19:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: net: Add SO_DETACH_REUSEPORT_BPF Martin KaFai Lau
2019-06-13 4:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-06-13 19:18 ` kbuild test robot
2019-06-13 20:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-06-13 21:18 ` Martin Lau
2019-06-12 19:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: Add test for SO_REUSEPORT_DETACH_BPF Martin KaFai Lau
2019-06-12 19:59 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2019-06-12 21:30 ` Martin Lau
2019-06-12 21:47 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-06-12 21:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-12 22:15 ` Martin Lau
2019-06-12 22:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-12 22:39 ` Martin Lau
2019-06-12 21:47 ` Martin Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190612195917.GB9056@mini-arch \
--to=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).