From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] objtool: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF generated code
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:11:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190614161101.vobuleyjap777ol5@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJ_-mFCeWoq-Uz9VRFkb3eLgAK+yC5hG=N7t5riGhmLWg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 08:13:49AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 1:11 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:35:38AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 09:08:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 08:20:30PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 01:57:11PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > and to patches 8 and 9.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, it's your code, but ... can I ask why? AT&T syntax is the
> > > > > standard for Linux, which is in fact the OS we are developing for.
> > > >
> > > > I agree, all assembly in Linux is AT&T, adding Intel notation only
> > > > serves to cause confusion.
> > >
> > > It's not assembly. It's C code that generates binary and here
> > > we're talking about comments.
> >
> > And comments are useless if they don't clarify. Intel syntax confuses.
> >
> > > I'm sure you're not proposing to do:
> > > /* mov src, dst */
> > > #define EMIT_mov(DST, SRC) \
> > > right?
> >
> > Which is why Josh reversed both of them. The current Intel order is just
> > terribly confusing. And I don't see any of the other JITs having
> > confusing comments like this.
> >
> > > bpf_jit_comp.c stays as-is. Enough of it.
> >
> > I think you're forgetting this is also arch/x86 code, and no, it needs
> > changes because its broken wrt unwinding.
>
> See MAINTAINERS file.
> If you guys keep insisting on pointless churn like this
> we'll move arch/x86/net/ into net/ where it probably belongs.
> netdev has its own comment style too.
> And it is also probably confusing to some folks.
So if I understand correctly, you're proposing that we move x86-specific
code to net/arch/x86 so you don't have to make your code readable to
others and adhere to kernel style guidelines?
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-14 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-13 13:20 [PATCH 0/9] x86/bpf: unwinder fixes Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 13:20 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf/x86: Always store regs->ip in perf_callchain_kernel() Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 13:20 ` [PATCH 2/9] objtool: Fix ORC unwinding in non-JIT BPF generated code Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 20:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 1:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 1:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 1:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 7:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-14 7:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-14 15:13 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 16:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2019-06-13 13:21 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/bpf: Move epilogue generation to a dedicated function Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 18:57 ` Song Liu
2019-06-13 19:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 13:21 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/bpf: Simplify prologue generation Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 13:21 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/bpf: Support SIB byte generation Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 13:21 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/bpf: Fix JIT frame pointer usage Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 21:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 1:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 1:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 1:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 10:50 ` David Laight
2019-06-14 13:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 13:58 ` David Laight
2019-06-14 17:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-17 15:07 ` David Laight
2019-06-13 13:21 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/unwind/orc: Fall back to using frame pointers for generated code Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 22:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 1:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 1:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 1:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 2:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 4:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 6:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 7:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-14 13:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 15:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 13:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 15:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-14 15:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 13:21 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/bpf: Convert asm comments to AT&T syntax Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 18:52 ` Song Liu
2019-06-13 19:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-14 7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-14 15:13 ` Song Liu
2019-06-13 13:21 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/bpf: Convert MOV function/macro argument ordering " Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-13 19:00 ` [PATCH 0/9] x86/bpf: unwinder fixes Song Liu
2019-06-13 20:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190614161101.vobuleyjap777ol5@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kasong@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox