From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: "René van Dorst" <opensource@vdorst.com>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, john@phrozen.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: mediatek: Add MT7621 TRGMII mode support
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 03:53:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190618015309.GA18088@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190617232004.Horde.mAVymZdeb9Jjf29W2PeOggU@www.vdorst.com>
> By adding some extra speed states in the code it seems to work.
>
> + if (state->speed == 1200)
> + mcr |= PMCR_FORCE_SPEED_1000;
Hi René
Is TRGMII always 1.2G? Or can you set it to 1000 or 1200? This
PMCR_FORCE_SPEED_1000 feels wrong.
> >We could consider adding 1200BaseT/Full?
>
> I don't have any opinion about this.
> It is great that it shows nicely in ethtool but I think supporting more
> speeds in phy_speed_to_str() is enough.
>
> Also you may want to add other SOCs trgmii ranges too:
> - 1200BaseT/Full for mt7621 only
> - 2000BaseT/Full for mt7623 and mt7683
> - 2600BaseT/Full for mt7623 only
Are these standardised in any way? Or MTK proprietary? Also, is the T
in BaseT correct? These speeds work over copper cables? Or should we
be talking about 1200BaseKX?
Thanks
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-18 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-16 18:20 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: mediatek: Add MT7621 TRGMII mode support René van Dorst
2019-06-16 18:20 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: ethernet: " René van Dorst
2019-06-16 18:20 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: mt7530: " René van Dorst
2019-06-17 14:02 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: mediatek: " Andrew Lunn
2019-06-17 21:33 ` René van Dorst
2019-06-17 21:44 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-06-17 23:20 ` René van Dorst
2019-06-18 1:53 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2019-06-18 2:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-06-18 11:46 ` René van Dorst
2019-06-17 22:19 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190618015309.GA18088@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opensource@vdorst.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).