From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nft_paylaod: add base type NFT_PAYLOAD_LL_HEADER_NO_TAG
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:33:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190618153331.6u44cwxnaejuswqo@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <591caf69-ba08-33b5-5330-8230779cc903@ucloud.cn>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:27:12PM +0800, wenxu wrote:
>
> 在 2019/6/18 17:37, Florian Westphal 写道:
> > wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn> wrote:
> >> On 6/18/2019 6:42 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> >>> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> >>>>> Subject: Change bridge l3 dependency to meta protocol
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This examines skb->protocol instead of ethernet header type, which
> >>>>> might be different when vlan is involved.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> + if (ctx->pctx.family == NFPROTO_BRIDGE && desc == &proto_eth) {
> >>>>> + if (expr->payload.desc == &proto_ip ||
> >>>>> + expr->payload.desc == &proto_ip6)
> >>>>> + desc = &proto_metaeth;
> >>>>> + }i
> >>>> Is this sufficient to restrict the matching? Is this still buggy from
> >>>> ingress?
> >>> This is what netdev family uses as well (skb->protocol i mean).
> >>> I'm not sure it will work for output however (haven't checked).
> >>>
> >>>> I wonder if an explicit NFT_PAYLOAD_CHECK_VLAN flag would be useful in
> >>>> the kernel, if so we could rename NFTA_PAYLOAD_CSUM_FLAGS to
> >>>> NFTA_PAYLOAD_FLAGS and place it there. Just an idea.
> >>> Another unresolved issue is presence of multiple vlan tags, so we might
> >>> have to add yet another meta key to retrieve the l3 protocol in use
> >> Maybe add a l3proto meta key can handle the multiple vlan tags case with the l3proto dependency. It
> >> should travese all the vlan tags and find the real l3 proto.
> > Yes, something like this.
> >
> > We also need to audit netdev and bridge expressions (reject is known broken)
> > to handle vlans properly.
> >
> > Still, switching nft to prefer skb->protocol instead of eth_hdr->type
> > for dependencies would be good as this doesn't need kernel changes and solves
> > the immediate problem of 'ip ...' not matching in case of vlan.
> >
> > If you have time, could you check if using skb->protocol works for nft
> > bridge in output, i.e. does 'nft ip protocol icmp' match when its used
> > from bridge output path with meta protocol dependency with and without
> > vlan in use?
>
> I just check the kernel codes and test with the output chain, the
> meta protocol dependency can also work in the outpu chain.
OK.
Florian, would you submit a patch, including a test for this?
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-18 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-10 7:21 [PATCH] netfilter: nft_paylaod: add base type NFT_PAYLOAD_LL_HEADER_NO_TAG wenxu
2019-06-10 9:44 ` Florian Westphal
2019-06-11 3:01 ` wenxu
2019-06-17 22:30 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-06-17 22:42 ` Florian Westphal
2019-06-18 8:26 ` wenxu
2019-06-18 9:37 ` Florian Westphal
2019-06-18 14:27 ` wenxu
2019-06-18 15:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2019-06-18 9:35 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-06-18 9:46 ` Florian Westphal
2019-06-18 10:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-06-18 10:45 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190618153331.6u44cwxnaejuswqo@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenxu@ucloud.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox