From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Takshak Chahande <ctakshak@fb.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Add BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE support in bpftool cgroup [show|tree]
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:47:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190624174726.2dda122b@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c2c76b-5a45-aab0-e698-b5a66ab6c2e7@fb.com>
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:40:09 +0000, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 6/24/19 5:30 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:21:57 +0000, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >> On 6/24/19 5:16 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:38:11 +0000, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >>>> I don't think this patch should be penalized.
> >>>> I'd rather see we fix them all.
> >>>
> >>> So we are going to add this broken option just to remove it?
> >>> I don't understand.
> >>> I'm happy to spend the 15 minutes rewriting this if you don't
> >>> want to penalize Takshak.
> >>
> >> hmm. I don't understand the 'broken' part.
> >> The only issue I see that it could have been local vs global,
> >> but they all should have been local.
> >
> > I don't think all of them. Only --mapcompat and --bpffs. bpffs could
> > be argued. On mapcompat I must have not read the patch fully, I was
> > under the impression its a global libbpf flag :(
> >
> > --json, --pretty, --nomount, --debug are global because they affect
> > global behaviour of bpftool. The difference here is that we basically
> > add a syscall parameter as a global option.
>
> sure. I only disagreed about not touching older flags.
> --effective should be local.
> If follow up patch means 90% rewrite then revert is better.
> If it's 10% fixup then it's different story.
I see. The local flag would not an option in getopt_long() sense, what
I was thinking was about adding an "effective" keyword:
# bpftool -e cgroup show /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup-test-work-dir/cg1/
becomes:
# bpftool cgroup show /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup-test-work-dir/cg1/ effective
That's how we handle flags for update calls for instance..
So I think a revert :(
> Takshak,
> could you check which way is cleaner? Revert and new patch or follow up fix?
> But bpftool doesn't have a way to do local, no?
> so it's kinda new feature and other flags should become local too.
> hence it feels more like follow up. Just my .02
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-21 22:33 [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Add BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE support in bpftool cgroup [show|tree] Takshak Chahande
2019-06-24 14:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-06-24 21:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-24 22:16 ` Andrey Ignatov
2019-06-24 22:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-24 23:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-25 0:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-25 0:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-25 0:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-25 0:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-25 0:47 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-06-25 0:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-25 1:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-06-25 1:39 ` Takshak Chahande
2019-06-25 1:22 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190624174726.2dda122b@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=ctakshak@fb.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdna@fb.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).