From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA57C48BD4 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC4F215EA for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730064AbfFYIWH (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 04:22:07 -0400 Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:52952 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729771AbfFYIWH (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 04:22:07 -0400 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90430C1A82 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:22:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E2D115104 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:22:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix, from userid 99) id 725BF1150DF; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:22:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8E7DA3F4; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:22:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.97 (192.168.1.97) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:22:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int) Received: from us.es (sys.soleta.eu [212.170.55.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 1984lsi) by entrada.int (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FC644265A32; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:22:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:22:02 +0200 X-SMTPAUTHUS: auth mail.us.es From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Jiri Pirko Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, ariel.elior@cavium.com, michael.chan@broadcom.com, santosh@chelsio.com, madalin.bucur@nxp.com, yisen.zhuang@huawei.com, salil.mehta@huawei.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, tariqt@mellanox.com, saeedm@mellanox.com, jiri@mellanox.com, idosch@mellanox.com, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com, ganeshgr@chelsio.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, Manish.Chopra@cavium.com, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, mkubecek@suse.cz, venkatkumar.duvvuru@broadcom.com, cphealy@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 11/12] net: flow_offload: don't allow block sharing until drivers support this Message-ID: <20190625082202.arwgwye5teecrp7r@salvia> References: <20190620194917.2298-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20190620194917.2298-12-pablo@netfilter.org> <20190625081627.GA2630@nanopsycho> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190625081627.GA2630@nanopsycho> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:16:27AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > I don't understand the purpose of this patch. Could you please provide > some description about what this is about. mlxsw supports block sharing > between ports. Or what kind of "sharing" do you have in mind? I'm refering to ethtool, tc and netfilter potentially using the same tc setup infrastructure infrastructure. At this stage, if one of them sets up the flow block, then, other subsystems will hit busy.