From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=8QdN=UY=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE99C48BD5
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:38:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0A7208CA
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:38:08 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="HPXrVkIr"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727730AbfFYMiH (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:38:07 -0400
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:57622 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726414AbfFYMiH (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:38:07 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch;
        s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:
        Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
        Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
        :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
        List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
        bh=pDMZZUAFrDEHV1Do3manOEoBSuloY+uQJvhtbRVK3ns=; b=HPXrVkIrqgdYZaeYeK9ztOG3nT
        lOysTfncJwq/2TAdCoDbMU2BPHC3CYIs2gEjO0mCJemy68YdKdEdXMRsoveMnpxF6DTAh/lLxXxY3
        xV9MA0UbdAgpzED8oXM5cVy+3rqW3eYrxyHXNRULd07QEsiPj/Ib7e9tjtdl0+nav9gQ=;
Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.89)
        (envelope-from <andrew@lunn.ch>)
        id 1hfki3-0005kc-Ui; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:38:03 +0200
Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 14:38:03 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phylink: further documentation clarifications
Message-ID: <20190625123803.GF17872@lunn.ch>
References: <E1hfi09-0007Zs-Vb@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1hfi09-0007Zs-Vb@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:44:33AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> Clarify the validate() behaviour in a few cases which weren't mentioned
> in the documentation, but which are necessary for users to get the
> correct behaviour.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

    Andrew