From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
To: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
Cc: GR-Linux-NIC-Dev <GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/16] qlge: Remove irq_cnt
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:36:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626113619.GA27420@f1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR18MB2697814343012B4363482290ABE20@DM6PR18MB2697.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
On 2019/06/26 08:59, Manish Chopra wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
> > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 1:19 PM
> > To: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>; GR-Linux-NIC-Dev <GR-Linux-
> > NIC-Dev@marvell.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/16] qlge: Remove irq_cnt
> >
> > qlge uses an irq enable/disable refcounting scheme that is:
> > * poorly implemented
> > Uses a spin_lock to protect accesses to the irq_cnt atomic variable
> > * buggy
> > Breaks when there is not a 1:1 sequence of irq - napi_poll, such as
> > when using SO_BUSY_POLL.
> > * unnecessary
> > The purpose or irq_cnt is to reduce irq control writes when
> > multiple work items result from one irq: the irq is re-enabled
> > after all work is done.
> > Analysis of the irq handler shows that there is only one case where
> > there might be two workers scheduled at once, and those have
> > separate irq masking bits.
>
> I believe you are talking about here for asic error recovery worker and MPI worker.
> Which separate IRQ masking bits are you referring here ?
INTR_EN with intr_dis_mask for completion interrupts
INTR_MASK bit INTR_MASK_PI for mpi interrupts
> > static int ql_validate_flash(struct ql_adapter *qdev, u32 size, const char *str)
> > @@ -2500,21 +2451,22 @@ static irqreturn_t qlge_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > u32 var;
> > int work_done = 0;
> >
> > - spin_lock(&qdev->hw_lock);
> > - if (atomic_read(&qdev->intr_context[0].irq_cnt)) {
> > - netif_printk(qdev, intr, KERN_DEBUG, qdev->ndev,
> > - "Shared Interrupt, Not ours!\n");
> > - spin_unlock(&qdev->hw_lock);
> > - return IRQ_NONE;
> > - }
> > - spin_unlock(&qdev->hw_lock);
> > + /* Experience shows that when using INTx interrupts, the device does
> > + * not always auto-mask the interrupt.
> > + * When using MSI mode, the interrupt must be explicitly disabled
> > + * (even though it is auto-masked), otherwise a later command to
> > + * enable it is not effective.
> > + */
> > + if (!test_bit(QL_MSIX_ENABLED, &qdev->flags))
> > + ql_disable_completion_interrupt(qdev, 0);
>
> Current code is disabling completion interrupt in case of MSI-X zeroth vector.
> This change will break that behavior. Shouldn't zeroth vector in case of MSI-X also disable completion interrupt ?
> If not, please explain why ?
In msix mode there's no need to explicitly disable completion
interrupts, they are reliably auto-masked, according to my observations.
I tested this on two QLE8142 adapters.
Do you have reason to believe this might not always be the case?
>
> >
> > - var = ql_disable_completion_interrupt(qdev, intr_context->intr);
> > + var = ql_read32(qdev, STS);
> >
> > /*
> > * Check for fatal error.
> > */
> > if (var & STS_FE) {
> > + ql_disable_completion_interrupt(qdev, 0);
>
> Why need to do it again here ? if before this it can disable completion interrupt for INT-X case and MSI-X zeroth vector case ?
I couldn't test this code path, so I preserved the original behavior.
>
> > ql_queue_asic_error(qdev);
> > netdev_err(qdev->ndev, "Got fatal error, STS = %x.\n", var);
> > var = ql_read32(qdev, ERR_STS);
> > @@ -2534,7 +2486,6 @@ static irqreturn_t qlge_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > */
> > netif_err(qdev, intr, qdev->ndev,
> > "Got MPI processor interrupt.\n");
> > - ql_disable_completion_interrupt(qdev, intr_context->intr);
>
> Why disable interrupt is not required here ?
The interrupt source _is_ masked:
ql_write32(qdev, INTR_MASK, (INTR_MASK_PI << 16));
> While in case of Fatal error case above ql_disable_completion_interrupt() is being called ?
> Also, in case of MSI-X zeroth vector it will not disable completion interrupt but at the end, it will end of qlge_isr() enabling completion interrupt.
> Seems like disabling and enabling might not be in sync in case of MSI-X zeroth vector.
I guess you forgot to consider that completion interrupts are
auto-masked in msix mode.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-17 7:48 [PATCH net-next 01/16] qlge: Remove irq_cnt Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 02/16] qlge: Remove page_chunk.last_flag Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 9:12 ` Manish Chopra
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 03/16] qlge: Deduplicate lbq_buf_size Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 9:24 ` [EXT] " Manish Chopra
2019-06-26 11:37 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 15:42 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-28 8:57 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-28 14:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 04/16] qlge: Remove bq_desc.maplen Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 9:31 ` Manish Chopra
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 05/16] qlge: Remove rx_ring.sbq_buf_size Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 9:36 ` [EXT] " Manish Chopra
2019-06-26 11:39 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 15:35 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 06/16] qlge: Remove useless dma synchronization calls Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 9:44 ` [EXT] " Manish Chopra
2019-06-18 2:51 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 07/16] qlge: Deduplicate rx buffer queue management Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-27 10:02 ` [EXT] " Manish Chopra
2019-07-09 2:10 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 08/16] qlge: Fix dma_sync_single calls Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 09/16] qlge: Remove rx_ring.type Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 10/16] qlge: Factor out duplicated expression Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-23 17:59 ` David Miller
2019-06-23 18:00 ` David Miller
2019-06-24 7:52 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-25 18:32 ` Manish Chopra
2019-06-28 8:52 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 11/16] qlge: Remove qlge_bq.len & size Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-27 10:47 ` Manish Chopra
2019-07-09 6:52 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 12/16] qlge: Remove useless memset Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 13/16] qlge: Replace memset with assignment Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 14/16] qlge: Update buffer queue prod index despite oom Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 15/16] qlge: Refill rx buffers up to multiple of 16 Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 16/16] qlge: Refill empty buffer queues from wq Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-27 14:18 ` [EXT] " Manish Chopra
2019-07-10 1:18 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 16:49 ` [PATCH net-next 01/16] qlge: Remove irq_cnt Manish Chopra
2019-06-26 8:59 ` Manish Chopra
2019-06-26 11:36 ` Benjamin Poirier [this message]
2019-06-26 13:21 ` Manish Chopra
2019-07-05 8:33 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-07-15 1:40 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-07-15 9:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190626113619.GA27420@f1 \
--to=bpoirier@suse.com \
--cc=GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com \
--cc=manishc@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).