From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>,
Ramesh Shanmugasundaram <ramesh.shanmugasundaram@bp.renesas.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Artemi Ivanov <artemi.ivanov@cogentembedded.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] can: rcar_canfd: fix possible IRQ storm on high load
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:12:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626131251.GB801@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190626130848.6671-1-nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2605 bytes --]
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:08:48PM +0300, Nikita Yushchenko wrote:
> We have observed rcar_canfd driver entering IRQ storm under high load,
> with following scenario:
> - rcar_canfd_global_interrupt() in entered due to Rx available,
> - napi_schedule_prep() is called, and sets NAPIF_STATE_SCHED in state
> - Rx fifo interrupts are masked,
> - rcar_canfd_global_interrupt() is entered again, this time due to
> error interrupt (e.g. due to overflow),
> - since scheduled napi poller has not yet executed, condition for calling
> napi_schedule_prep() from rcar_canfd_global_interrupt() remains true,
> thus napi_schedule_prep() gets called and sets NAPIF_STATE_MISSED flag
> in state,
> - later, napi poller function rcar_canfd_rx_poll() gets executed, and
> calls napi_complete_done(),
> - due to NAPIF_STATE_MISSED flag in state, this call does not clear
> NAPIF_STATE_SCHED flag from state,
> - on return from napi_complete_done(), rcar_canfd_rx_poll() unmasks Rx
> interrutps,
> - Rx interrupt happens, rcar_canfd_global_interrupt() gets called
> and calls napi_schedule_prep(),
> - since NAPIF_STATE_SCHED is set in state at this time, this call
> returns false,
> - due to that false return, rcar_canfd_global_interrupt() returns
> without masking Rx interrupt
> - and this results into IRQ storm: unmasked Rx interrupt happens again
> and again is misprocessed in the same way.
>
> This patch fixes that scenario by unmasking Rx interrupts only when
> napi_complete_done() returns true, which means it has cleared
> NAPIF_STATE_SCHED in state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com>
CCing the driver author...
> ---
> drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> index 05410008aa6b..de34a4b82d4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> @@ -1508,10 +1508,11 @@ static int rcar_canfd_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota)
>
> /* All packets processed */
> if (num_pkts < quota) {
> - napi_complete_done(napi, num_pkts);
> - /* Enable Rx FIFO interrupts */
> - rcar_canfd_set_bit(priv->base, RCANFD_RFCC(ridx),
> - RCANFD_RFCC_RFIE);
> + if (napi_complete_done(napi, num_pkts)) {
> + /* Enable Rx FIFO interrupts */
> + rcar_canfd_set_bit(priv->base, RCANFD_RFCC(ridx),
> + RCANFD_RFCC_RFIE);
> + }
> }
> return num_pkts;
> }
> --
> 2.11.0
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-26 13:08 [PATCH resend] can: rcar_canfd: fix possible IRQ storm on high load Nikita Yushchenko
2019-06-26 13:12 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2019-06-26 13:32 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190626131251.GB801@ninjato \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=artemi.ivanov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=horms+renesas@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikita.yoush@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=ramesh.shanmugasundaram@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox