netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jaswinder.singh@linaro.org,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [net-next, PATCH, v2] net: netsec: Sync dma for device on buffer allocation
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 22:12:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190704191247.GA1382@apalos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190704175250.GA15876@apalos>

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 08:52:50PM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 07:39:44PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > On Thu,  4 Jul 2019 17:46:09 +0300
> > Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Quoting Arnd,
> > > 
> > > We have to do a sync_single_for_device /somewhere/ before the
> > > buffer is given to the device. On a non-cache-coherent machine with
> > > a write-back cache, there may be dirty cache lines that get written back
> > > after the device DMA's data into it (e.g. from a previous memset
> > > from before the buffer got freed), so you absolutely need to flush any
> > > dirty cache lines on it first.
> > > 
> > > Since the coherency is configurable in this device make sure we cover
> > > all configurations by explicitly syncing the allocated buffer for the
> > > device before refilling it's descriptors
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Changes since V1: 
> > > - Make the code more readable
> > >  
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 7 ++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> > > index 5544a722543f..ada7626bf3a2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> > > @@ -727,21 +727,26 @@ static void *netsec_alloc_rx_data(struct netsec_priv *priv,
> > >  {
> > >  
> > >  	struct netsec_desc_ring *dring = &priv->desc_ring[NETSEC_RING_RX];
> > > +	enum dma_data_direction dma_dir;
> > > +	dma_addr_t dma_start;
> > >  	struct page *page;
> > >  
> > >  	page = page_pool_dev_alloc_pages(dring->page_pool);
> > >  	if (!page)
> > >  		return NULL;
> > >  
> > > +	dma_start = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page);
> > >  	/* We allocate the same buffer length for XDP and non-XDP cases.
> > >  	 * page_pool API will map the whole page, skip what's needed for
> > >  	 * network payloads and/or XDP
> > >  	 */
> > > -	*dma_handle = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page) + NETSEC_RXBUF_HEADROOM;
> > > +	*dma_handle = dma_start + NETSEC_RXBUF_HEADROOM;
> > >  	/* Make sure the incoming payload fits in the page for XDP and non-XDP
> > >  	 * cases and reserve enough space for headroom + skb_shared_info
> > >  	 */
> > >  	*desc_len = PAGE_SIZE - NETSEC_RX_BUF_NON_DATA;
> > > +	dma_dir = page_pool_get_dma_dir(dring->page_pool);
> > > +	dma_sync_single_for_device(priv->dev, dma_start, PAGE_SIZE, dma_dir);
> > 
> > It's it costly to sync_for_device the entire page size?
> > 
> > E.g. we already know that the head-room is not touched by device.  And
> > we actually want this head-room cache-hot for e.g. xdp_frame, thus it
> > would be unfortunate if the head-room is explicitly evicted from the
> > cache here.
> > 
> > Even smarter, the driver could do the sync for_device, when it
> > release/recycle page, as it likely know the exact length that was used
> > by the packet.
> It does sync for device when recycling takes place in XDP_TX with the correct
> size. 
> I guess i can explicitly sync on the xdp_return_buff cases, and 
> netsec_setup_rx_dring() instead of the generic buffer allocation
> 
> I'll send a V3

On a second thought i think this is going to look a bit complicated for no
apparent reason.
If i do this i'll have to track the buffers that got recycled vs buffers 
that are freshly allocated (and sync in this case). I currently have no 
way of cwtelling if the buffer is new or recycled, so i'll just sync the 
payload for now as you suggested.

Maybe this information can be added on page_pool_dev_alloc_pages() ?

Thanks
/Ilias

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-04 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-04 14:46 [net-next, PATCH, v2] net: netsec: Sync dma for device on buffer allocation Ilias Apalodimas
2019-07-04 15:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-04 17:39 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-07-04 17:52   ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-07-04 19:12     ` Ilias Apalodimas [this message]
2019-07-05 22:45 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190704191247.GA1382@apalos \
    --to=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).