From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E648C73C6D for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 05:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4712820838 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 05:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Zc9YnkmE" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726695AbfGJF5Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 01:57:16 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f68.google.com ([209.85.208.68]:35130 "EHLO mail-ed1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725791AbfGJF5Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 01:57:16 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f68.google.com with SMTP id w20so816075edd.2; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:57:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=gJAx2qQTU93m+bCh71C22HskJxiWkG6DmgTcMb27tPM=; b=Zc9YnkmEMq3c54zuojXF8A546raU1kiI5/Y9LDUZmrLw/kY7ScY9kaqFx1tfhkUubE C1ECA9L9ZptcBpmXNg+5IWtRNBDi9PIjxrf1LG4Z14MkcMZcJr1XYqgRmVRAIZq3BDks 56sMW8abqRu1E+hOo90chE1hxY34HEy7d6IBXYsliK2n6kUVc0SK4nSv7Q0Rswl03WEc fUTUNt1brqmS2w9ix6eD/ytHhE2/kbeEAsvfbzQ/5XiRwJJVrMj74rwAD+zCgu88QNN6 jNzuVN5lf7q7Om1JFh12rbS1apM/g7lcBrGd74HX9P9igE49SPYBqwizmX6BfDdBHE4f 1KkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=gJAx2qQTU93m+bCh71C22HskJxiWkG6DmgTcMb27tPM=; b=MQPtz+KFywpzwi7NY+sttMkNo6mxcKHalD/PGDuQJZCEDCnyM3YwvJuX+Lyeda++II qZfNHInsbuPtI5O+yLioorBdSTZDqJBQS0BgebrBvLYHCq4jOrrGTvjxIFkJamhzHl5y RNWU23ac8mwYa8ECsAPNeunjv6glIcelDZiw46vk2OT51OKZT5hm5aObwJbQaN478AjZ Rl2k1s2aHtlFPmM4dzqtS5PwYW5/qx0i+adFOMv2Hvq9drFWddahw4/lcw8nKRS4+7WX 5IoSxpovEWFkhMuTzR6FW3gw2pxk78geX6kdUrefdP3JeBZcGjvzyBRvFllDN+oZVVc4 +fFw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/nybX2OvpmJF0NH5MOp3K3+Sj0EhzoG/2K+GjCVZ6F0hm9T3S ZWOoNZH0VIbcmcsBP5SV/whq2NH1jZsofA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8Cpc8UEm2hUL901ll/sUhvLcWmh051Kcc1OYlue0B7D5yMOFjcx94Sy69k5uU/qfayrrBYw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:84f:: with SMTP id f15mr8820492ejd.22.1562738234262; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archlinux-epyc ([2a01:4f9:2b:2b15::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k25sm142727ejp.65.2019.07.09.22.57.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 22:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 22:57:11 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: David Miller Cc: saeedm@mellanox.com, leon@kernel.org, borisp@mellanox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, ndesaulniers@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/mlx5e: Refactor switch statements to avoid using uninitialized variables Message-ID: <20190710055711.GA52052@archlinux-epyc> References: <20190708231154.89969-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> <20190710044748.3924-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> <20190709.223657.1108624224137142530.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190709.223657.1108624224137142530.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:36:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > I applied your simpler addition of the return statement so that I could > get the net-next pull request out tonight, just FYI... Thanks for the heads up, I'll spin up a v3 just focusing on the refactoring. Cheers, Nathan