From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D20C76186 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 20:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA523208E4 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 20:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388253AbfG0U1Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jul 2019 16:27:25 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:39828 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387841AbfG0U1Y (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Jul 2019 16:27:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::d71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 555C1153409C1; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 13:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 13:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20190727.132723.666166803498081831.davem@davemloft.net> To: baijiaju1990@gmail.com Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: ipv6: Fix a possible null-pointer dereference in vti6_link_config() From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20190726080321.4466-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com> References: <20190726080321.4466-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sat, 27 Jul 2019 13:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Jia-Ju Bai Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:03:21 +0800 > @@ -646,9 +646,10 @@ static void vti6_link_config(struct ip6_tnl *t, bool keep_mtu) > &p->raddr, &p->laddr, > p->link, NULL, strict); > > - if (rt) > + if (rt) { > tdev = rt->dst.dev; > - ip6_rt_put(rt); > + ip6_rt_put(rt); > + } ip6_rt_put() can take a NULL argument without any problem. I want to make it clear that because of mistakes of this nature, and how frequently you make them, it is very tiring and exhausting to review your changes...