From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB84C433FF for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C6D20578 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="gnpcRKVA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387616AbfG2Pva (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:51:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com ([209.85.214.194]:37150 "EHLO mail-pl1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387496AbfG2Pva (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:51:30 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id b3so27694533plr.4 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:51:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version; bh=Sf0m7JEZMUUuDoL9U1xqF7CQ40WOkIEU+KrNM0j4H5Y=; b=gnpcRKVA/LWds4IEPAmXMViqA0s5eJpC6BTrArgD6qYibMDYNtZTFgdpAyN4lY4KDE PxxiqC2SaeDKyDxL/zRQDVEtWaA8nxy9aUVT8z2cbogwdrPoP2JER3t/Aid3bWu7Uk2z yzLiHCIfbhipnntrlMAKgITFDanA4gUGxMTs/WFdIiJmMy9iHAVUJsd8BEJ7xrV7yRv5 X1XlM/fHAMyo239CE7fSmZQF0FutlqjWP2LL+SiPeaZvTykl7jLh1snp8HsjhlUxYwNE 0mxI6veQ5C2jSOgVSxYzI4icgjsygf+fGPtMfy6KJClf773QplMCBptLd9+yEoEITQIw EeeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=Sf0m7JEZMUUuDoL9U1xqF7CQ40WOkIEU+KrNM0j4H5Y=; b=eBRQj4RxBt+bERmOgVhD7Y1QTUXfkcWT8BGeTanAgiguSpP7ZV18UGPle7xI5aBv6w mak/JoStEDb4KqvC0juQEw3w1ezWOHUaGT8L4jk7OHEMx56vRukVFgT9sciObYFHwPt8 bcv9YJcbILDcLK6jY8bxHiLefm8190eQwQAv43yluoQtwXV3tndj+iIpPpNoC6v/tZe0 PVdmAMl8CAyK6vrAXkmfozmaglP2eLqOefTtPbVsoxGpVYjanL+TVS3h4Le6tkTdWvrM ZsGn7HtuXlYdCEjRAk8U1zmZMLzKBGjuYqdJIvJWoZUIWlhXLEKR56r49ewfpR52fb+i fNOg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWksJirvylgYLcCD4oF8FX/qJ1+5lYQmjRqG7Go4/gbJWWPwslO /r0v0jJ6JR3Xavmuvkq6JuA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyI2mE3NI5wtrvXieo4lb4+5FCoVQAW4BWDP8dAATd1lwW3WlrJRYHKGcNQYT3v4M5DDid82A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:be12:: with SMTP id r18mr105484394pls.341.1564415489778; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.lan (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t96sm56135003pjb.1.2019.07.29.08.51.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:51:22 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Kurt Kanzenbach Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 0/1] Fix s64 argument parsing Message-ID: <20190729085122.32d20033@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190729110408.fi6xfhc2msg5elih@linutronix.de> References: <20190704122427.22256-1-kurt@linutronix.de> <20190729110408.fi6xfhc2msg5elih@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/.7A4CCzw_++3cjhR9lrV/L0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/.7A4CCzw_++3cjhR9lrV/L0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:04:09 +0200 Kurt Kanzenbach wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:24:26PM +0200, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote: > > Hi, > > > > while using the TAPRIO Qdisc on ARM32 I've noticed that the base_time p= arameter is > > incorrectly configured. The problem is the utility function get_s64() u= sed by > > TAPRIO doesn't parse the value correctly. =20 >=20 > polite ping. >=20 > > > > Thanks, > > Kurt > > > > Kurt Kanzenbach (1): > > utils: Fix get_s64() function > > > > lib/utils.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > -- > > 2.11.0 > > =20 Not sure why this got marked "Changes Requested" Applied. --Sig_/.7A4CCzw_++3cjhR9lrV/L0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEn2/DRbBb5+dmuDyPgKd/YJXN5H4FAl0/FfoACgkQgKd/YJXN 5H4NtBAAr3GdkPs0OoNpzOKRN8UxB7FsmYCWfMqdmx8HVnsjrUE2yNaMorDeeKZb 2qo7wOGzExcBzDV940c/djNVCFHSJhZ8PxNGaEkEnB4ULqsVqzsmyfw8P3Vs9dw0 LQEyzpyLCOFE/F85HN79u6ehRh0ZTgaYqoYJewgpQMyBBkdl36ONjiaHNpYN5R90 DrQDjgzCIkW8b3KE8DxzCloE515T4QZS/JvVOllVsoaYy2vSXBENITjmf4NgzRFf cYQQkIT6P/DiQ9DXKTYLKgOZKzKSjJ4teLU2LtwyGB6E/qHS42Dy/S+01lFHui1o wIL1eV468lIY2R1Z+c1L/DB9krsgti4rpQhqDU/N11B/YBKiMqegD8NH5rVLD6m2 hw4DyJ1o+Tngsi55aCxh28Np1Ei6+VV60EPv1Tb1nP0j45k4E8z+rUhOvmHQrCKG jQ7mFco+/xRtR+TBb0pFI/vF9BJQ2cMS4EMiA3x1r48l93u8/oTN/BD7uY0ZqL7U Ip8hhU/MGrThC/VyPGRi4d0EPwn6Au1gQHg+uFLSQSRj5+rBGwju5FLGCfabY55J AH1oG3p5EyH9leEpGmOXBqXoIIZuupoV+QSvzwFq+o75LC8Tk51cd7MXkD8vW/mT tXx+9vB7IbtaoR1lHu8ZuaVz4o7Kp2MOe+7hxztD1iT2U7aGYZ8= =2xPl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/.7A4CCzw_++3cjhR9lrV/L0--