From: Takshak Chahande <ctakshak@fb.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <rdna@fb.com>,
<ctakshak@fb.com>, <kernel-team@fb.com>, <hechaol@fb.com>,
<jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2] libbpf : make libbpf_num_possible_cpus function thread safe
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:10:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190731221055.1478201-1-ctakshak@fb.com> (raw)
Having static variable `cpus` in libbpf_num_possible_cpus function
without guarding it with mutex makes this function thread-unsafe.
If multiple threads accessing this function, in the current form; it
leads to incrementing the static variable value `cpus` in the multiple
of total available CPUs.
Used local stack variable to calculate the number of possible CPUs and
then updated the static variable using WRITE_ONCE().
Changes since v1:
* added stack variable to calculate cpus
* serialized static variable update using WRITE_ONCE()
* fixed Fixes tag
Fixes: 6446b3155521 ("bpf: add a new API libbpf_num_possible_cpus()")
Signed-off-by: Takshak Chahande <ctakshak@fb.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 6718d0b90130..2e84fa5b8479 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -4995,13 +4995,15 @@ int libbpf_num_possible_cpus(void)
static const char *fcpu = "/sys/devices/system/cpu/possible";
int len = 0, n = 0, il = 0, ir = 0;
unsigned int start = 0, end = 0;
+ int tmp_cpus = 0;
static int cpus;
char buf[128];
int error = 0;
int fd = -1;
- if (cpus > 0)
- return cpus;
+ tmp_cpus = READ_ONCE(cpus);
+ if (tmp_cpus > 0)
+ return tmp_cpus;
fd = open(fcpu, O_RDONLY);
if (fd < 0) {
@@ -5024,7 +5026,7 @@ int libbpf_num_possible_cpus(void)
}
buf[len] = '\0';
- for (ir = 0, cpus = 0; ir <= len; ir++) {
+ for (ir = 0, tmp_cpus = 0; ir <= len; ir++) {
/* Each sub string separated by ',' has format \d+-\d+ or \d+ */
if (buf[ir] == ',' || buf[ir] == '\0') {
buf[ir] = '\0';
@@ -5036,13 +5038,15 @@ int libbpf_num_possible_cpus(void)
} else if (n == 1) {
end = start;
}
- cpus += end - start + 1;
+ tmp_cpus += end - start + 1;
il = ir + 1;
}
}
- if (cpus <= 0) {
- pr_warning("Invalid #CPUs %d from %s\n", cpus, fcpu);
+ if (tmp_cpus <= 0) {
+ pr_warning("Invalid #CPUs %d from %s\n", tmp_cpus, fcpu);
return -EINVAL;
}
- return cpus;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(cpus, tmp_cpus);
+ return tmp_cpus;
}
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-07-31 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-31 22:10 Takshak Chahande [this message]
2019-07-31 22:17 ` [Potential Spoof] [PATCH bpf v2] libbpf : make libbpf_num_possible_cpus function thread safe Andrey Ignatov
2019-07-31 22:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-01 3:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190731221055.1478201-1-ctakshak@fb.com \
--to=ctakshak@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hechaol@fb.com \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdna@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox