From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jon.maloy@ericsson.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gordan.mihaljevic@dektech.com.au,
tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au, hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au,
canh.d.luu@dektech.com.au, ying.xue@windriver.com,
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [net-next 1/1] tipc: reduce risk of wakeup queue starvation
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 18:19:59 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190801.181959.616930719935387626.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1564496598-5080-1-git-send-email-jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
From: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:23:18 +0200
> In commit 365ad353c256 ("tipc: reduce risk of user starvation during
> link congestion") we allowed senders to add exactly one list of extra
> buffers to the link backlog queues during link congestion (aka
> "oversubscription"). However, the criteria for when to stop adding
> wakeup messages to the input queue when the overload abates is
> inaccurate, and may cause starvation problems during very high load.
>
> Currently, we stop adding wakeup messages after 10 total failed attempts
> where we find that there is no space left in the backlog queue for a
> certain importance level. The counter for this is accumulated across all
> levels, which may lead the algorithm to leave the loop prematurely,
> although there may still be plenty of space available at some levels.
> The result is sometimes that messages near the wakeup queue tail are not
> added to the input queue as they should be.
>
> We now introduce a more exact algorithm, where we keep adding wakeup
> messages to a level as long as the backlog queue has free slots for
> the corresponding level, and stop at the moment there are no more such
> slots or when there are no more wakeup messages to dequeue.
>
> Fixes: 365ad35 ("tipc: reduce risk of user starvation during link congestion")
> Reported-by: Tung Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au>
> Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Applied, thank you.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-01 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-30 14:23 [net-next 1/1] tipc: reduce risk of wakeup queue starvation Jon Maloy
2019-08-01 22:19 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190801.181959.616930719935387626.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=canh.d.luu@dektech.com.au \
--cc=gordan.mihaljevic@dektech.com.au \
--cc=hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au \
--cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).