From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE30BC433FF for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 19:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7772084C for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 19:48:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388723AbfHATsR (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 15:48:17 -0400 Received: from esa5.microchip.iphmx.com ([216.71.150.166]:56704 "EHLO esa5.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388609AbfHATsQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Aug 2019 15:48:16 -0400 Received-SPF: Pass (esa5.microchip.iphmx.com: domain of Horatiu.Vultur@microchip.com designates 198.175.253.82 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=198.175.253.82; receiver=esa5.microchip.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Horatiu.Vultur@microchip.com"; x-sender="Horatiu.Vultur@microchip.com"; x-conformance=spf_only; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 mx a:ushub1.microchip.com a:smtpout.microchip.com a:mx1.microchip.iphmx.com a:mx2.microchip.iphmx.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:mktomail.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa5.microchip.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@email.microchip.com) identity=helo; client-ip=198.175.253.82; receiver=esa5.microchip.iphmx.com; envelope-from="Horatiu.Vultur@microchip.com"; x-sender="postmaster@email.microchip.com"; x-conformance=spf_only Authentication-Results: esa5.microchip.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=Horatiu.Vultur@microchip.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@email.microchip.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) d=microchip.com IronPort-SDR: vh3SLtMYu6k4fqJwhEDyt9vB+HTFrRtUMMAYRXhLpZz/G5/KmnyRPtQ6KVry3TRiuG/YK8jJ6m Hmmubl6WlDk9ohCjUswhFHuMTZM87QrjuHgT5KK5bJp1D+97sKARTYHu8+7muTpHWb/lLDu5dk cPUxkt7wFbyTQQasCcHEtlXbNlEtnrRbwYD5p7ftCdqVf8b4S+EGJkr9Srwa+Mq+tkxTw52vru LvKk+ztTVLe8MhJ664jNcB16AfSCI9HzS0glqLH/PkY5H1hpzbcmhxuj5GHFJkkOa1WJdyNZyK gvs= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,335,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="42100612" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa5.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 01 Aug 2019 12:48:15 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:48:07 -0700 Received: from localhost (10.10.85.251) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 12:48:08 -0700 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 21:48:02 +0200 From: Horatiu Vultur To: Vivien Didelot CC: , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bridge: Allow bridge to joing multicast groups Message-ID: <20190801194801.rqv5jvb5vxjo2dor@soft-dev3.microsemi.net> References: <1564055044-27593-1-git-send-email-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> <20190801151739.GB32290@t480s.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190801151739.GB32290@t480s.localdomain> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Vivien, The 08/01/2019 15:17, Vivien Didelot wrote: > External E-Mail > > I'm a bit late in the conversation. Isn't this what you want? > > ip address add dev br0 autojoin > Not really, I was looking in a way to register the ports to link layer multicast address. Sorry for the confusion, my description of the patch was totally missleaning. If you follow this thread you will get a better idea what we wanted to achive. We got some really good comments and based on these we send a RFC[1]. > > Thanks, > Vivien [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1140468/ -- /Horatiu