From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
brandon.cazander@multapplied.net,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net v1 PATCH 4/4] net: fix bpf_xdp_adjust_head regression for generic-XDP
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 09:53:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190802095350.7242399b@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190801174406.0b554bb9@cakuba.netronome.com>
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:44:06 -0700
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Aug 2019 20:00:31 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > When generic-XDP was moved to a later processing step by commit
> > 458bf2f224f0 ("net: core: support XDP generic on stacked devices.")
> > a regression was introduced when using bpf_xdp_adjust_head.
> >
> > The issue is that after this commit the skb->network_header is now
> > changed prior to calling generic XDP and not after. Thus, if the header
> > is changed by XDP (via bpf_xdp_adjust_head), then skb->network_header
> > also need to be updated again. Fix by calling skb_reset_network_header().
> >
> > Fixes: 458bf2f224f0 ("net: core: support XDP generic on stacked devices.")
> > Reported-by: Brandon Cazander <brandon.cazander@multapplied.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
>
> Out of curiosity what was your conclusion regarding resetting the
> transport header as well?
Well, I don't know... I need some review, from e.g. Stephen that
changed this... I've added code snippets below signature to helper
reviewers (also helps understand below paragraph).
I think, we perhaps should call skb_reset_transport_header(), as we
change skb->data (via either __skb_pull() or __skb_push()), *BUT* I'm
not sure it is needed/required, as someone/something afterwards still
need to call skb_set_transport_header(), which also calls
skb_reset_transport_header() anyway.
I also want to ask reviewers, if we should move the call to
skb_reset_mac_len() (which Stephen added) in __netif_receive_skb_core()
into netif_receive_generic_xdp() (after the call to
skb_reset_network_header()), (it would be more natural to keep them
together)?
- -
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Code snippet
/* check if bpf_xdp_adjust_head was used */
off = xdp->data - orig_data;
if (off) {
if (off > 0)
__skb_pull(skb, off);
else if (off < 0)
__skb_push(skb, -off);
skb->mac_header += off;
skb_reset_network_header(skb);
}
static inline bool skb_transport_header_was_set(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
return skb->transport_header != (typeof(skb->transport_header))~0U;
}
static inline unsigned char *skb_transport_header(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
return skb->head + skb->transport_header;
}
static inline void skb_reset_transport_header(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
skb->transport_header = skb->data - skb->head;
}
static inline void skb_set_transport_header(struct sk_buff *skb,
const int offset)
{
skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
skb->transport_header += offset;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190731211211.GA87084@multapplied.net>
2019-08-01 18:00 ` [net v1 PATCH 0/4] net: fix regressions for generic-XDP Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-08-01 18:00 ` [net v1 PATCH 1/4] bpf: fix XDP vlan selftests test_xdp_vlan.sh Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-08-01 18:00 ` [net v1 PATCH 2/4] selftests/bpf: add wrapper scripts for test_xdp_vlan.sh Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-08-01 18:00 ` [net v1 PATCH 3/4] selftests/bpf: reduce time to execute test_xdp_vlan.sh Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-08-01 18:00 ` [net v1 PATCH 4/4] net: fix bpf_xdp_adjust_head regression for generic-XDP Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-08-02 0:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-02 7:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2019-08-02 17:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-05 18:19 ` [net v1 PATCH 0/4] net: fix regressions " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190802095350.7242399b@carbon \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=brandon.cazander@multapplied.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).