* [PATCH] tools: bpftool: fix reading from /proc/config.gz
@ 2019-08-05 0:15 Peter Wu
2019-08-05 10:41 ` Quentin Monnet
2019-08-05 15:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Wu @ 2019-08-05 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann
Cc: netdev, Stanislav Fomichev, Jakub Kicinski, Quentin Monnet
/proc/config has never existed as far as I can see, but /proc/config.gz
is present on Arch Linux. Execute an external gunzip program to avoid
linking to zlib and rework the option scanning code since a pipe is not
seekable. This also fixes a file handle leak on some error paths.
Fixes: 4567b983f78c ("tools: bpftool: add probes for kernel configuration options")
Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
---
tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
index d672d9086fff..e9e10f582047 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
@@ -284,34 +284,34 @@ static void probe_jit_limit(void)
}
}
-static char *get_kernel_config_option(FILE *fd, const char *option)
+static bool get_kernel_config_option(FILE *fd, char **buf_p, size_t *n_p,
+ char **value)
{
- size_t line_n = 0, optlen = strlen(option);
- char *res, *strval, *line = NULL;
- ssize_t n;
+ char *sep;
+ ssize_t linelen;
- rewind(fd);
- while ((n = getline(&line, &line_n, fd)) > 0) {
- if (strncmp(line, option, optlen))
+ while ((linelen = getline(buf_p, n_p, fd)) > 0) {
+ char *line = *buf_p;
+ if (strncmp(line, "CONFIG_", 7))
continue;
- /* Check we have at least '=', value, and '\n' */
- if (strlen(line) < optlen + 3)
- continue;
- if (*(line + optlen) != '=')
+
+ sep = memchr(line, '=', linelen);
+ if (!sep)
continue;
/* Trim ending '\n' */
- line[strlen(line) - 1] = '\0';
+ line[linelen - 1] = '\0';
+
+ /* Split on '=' and ensure that a value is present. */
+ *sep = '\0';
+ if (!sep[1])
+ continue;
- /* Copy and return config option value */
- strval = line + optlen + 1;
- res = strdup(strval);
- free(line);
- return res;
+ *value = sep + 1;
+ return true;
}
- free(line);
- return NULL;
+ return false;
}
static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
@@ -386,31 +386,34 @@ static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
/* test_bpf module for BPF tests */
"CONFIG_TEST_BPF",
};
+ char *values[ARRAY_SIZE(options)] = { };
char *value, *buf = NULL;
struct utsname utsn;
char path[PATH_MAX];
size_t i, n;
ssize_t ret;
- FILE *fd;
+ FILE *fd = NULL;
+ bool is_pipe = false;
if (uname(&utsn))
- goto no_config;
+ goto end_parse;
snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/boot/config-%s", utsn.release);
fd = fopen(path, "r");
if (!fd && errno == ENOENT) {
- /* Some distributions put the config file at /proc/config, give
- * it a try.
- * Sometimes it is also at /proc/config.gz but we do not try
- * this one for now, it would require linking against libz.
+ /* Some distributions build with CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y and put the
+ * config file at /proc/config.gz. We try to invoke an external
+ * gzip program to avoid linking to libz.
+ * Hide stderr to avoid interference with the JSON output.
*/
- fd = fopen("/proc/config", "r");
+ fd = popen("gunzip -c /proc/config.gz 2>/dev/null", "r");
+ is_pipe = true;
}
if (!fd) {
p_info("skipping kernel config, can't open file: %s",
strerror(errno));
- goto no_config;
+ goto end_parse;
}
/* Sanity checks */
ret = getline(&buf, &n, fd);
@@ -418,27 +421,36 @@ static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
if (!buf || !ret) {
p_info("skipping kernel config, can't read from file: %s",
strerror(errno));
- free(buf);
- goto no_config;
+ goto end_parse;
}
if (strcmp(buf, "# Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.\n")) {
p_info("skipping kernel config, can't find correct file");
- free(buf);
- goto no_config;
+ goto end_parse;
+ }
+
+ while (get_kernel_config_option(fd, &buf, &n, &value)) {
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(options); i++) {
+ if (values[i] || strcmp(buf, options[i]))
+ continue;
+
+ values[i] = strdup(value);
+ }
+ }
+
+end_parse:
+ if (fd) {
+ if (is_pipe) {
+ if (pclose(fd))
+ p_info("failed to read /proc/config.gz");
+ } else
+ fclose(fd);
}
free(buf);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(options); i++) {
- value = get_kernel_config_option(fd, options[i]);
- print_kernel_option(options[i], value);
- free(value);
+ print_kernel_option(options[i], values[i]);
+ free(values[i]);
}
- fclose(fd);
- return;
-
-no_config:
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(options); i++)
- print_kernel_option(options[i], NULL);
}
static bool probe_bpf_syscall(const char *define_prefix)
--
2.22.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tools: bpftool: fix reading from /proc/config.gz
2019-08-05 0:15 [PATCH] tools: bpftool: fix reading from /proc/config.gz Peter Wu
@ 2019-08-05 10:41 ` Quentin Monnet
2019-08-05 15:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Monnet @ 2019-08-05 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Wu, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann
Cc: netdev, Stanislav Fomichev, Jakub Kicinski
Hi Peter,
Thanks for looking into this (and for the fixes)! Some comments below.
2019-08-05 01:15 UTC+0100 ~ Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
> /proc/config has never existed as far as I can see, but /proc/config.gz
As far as I understood (from examining Cilium [0]), /proc/config _is_
used by some distributions, such as CoreOS. This is why we look at that
location in bpftool.
[0] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/blob/master/bpf/run_probes.sh#L42
> is present on Arch Linux. Execute an external gunzip program to avoid
> linking to zlib and rework the option scanning code since a pipe is not
> seekable. This also fixes a file handle leak on some error paths.
>
> Fixes: 4567b983f78c ("tools: bpftool: add probes for kernel configuration options")
> Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
> ---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> index d672d9086fff..e9e10f582047 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> @@ -284,34 +284,34 @@ static void probe_jit_limit(void)
> }
> }
>
> -static char *get_kernel_config_option(FILE *fd, const char *option)
> +static bool get_kernel_config_option(FILE *fd, char **buf_p, size_t *n_p,
> + char **value)
Maybe we could rename this function, and have "next" appear in it
somewhere? After your changes, it does not return the value for a
specific option anymore.
> {
> - size_t line_n = 0, optlen = strlen(option);
> - char *res, *strval, *line = NULL;
> - ssize_t n;
> + char *sep;
> + ssize_t linelen;
Please order the declarations in reverse-Christmas tree style.
>
> - rewind(fd);
> - while ((n = getline(&line, &line_n, fd)) > 0) {
> - if (strncmp(line, option, optlen))
> + while ((linelen = getline(buf_p, n_p, fd)) > 0) {
> + char *line = *buf_p;
Please leave a blank line after declarations.
> + if (strncmp(line, "CONFIG_", 7))
> continue;
> - /* Check we have at least '=', value, and '\n' */
> - if (strlen(line) < optlen + 3)
> - continue;
> - if (*(line + optlen) != '=')
> +
> + sep = memchr(line, '=', linelen);
> + if (!sep)
> continue;
>
> /* Trim ending '\n' */
> - line[strlen(line) - 1] = '\0';
> + line[linelen - 1] = '\0';
> +
> + /* Split on '=' and ensure that a value is present. */
> + *sep = '\0';
> + if (!sep[1])
> + continue;
>
> - /* Copy and return config option value */
> - strval = line + optlen + 1;
> - res = strdup(strval);
> - free(line);
> - return res;
> + *value = sep + 1;
> + return true;
> }
> - free(line);
>
> - return NULL;
> + return false;
> }
>
> static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
> @@ -386,31 +386,34 @@ static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
> /* test_bpf module for BPF tests */
> "CONFIG_TEST_BPF",
> };
> + char *values[ARRAY_SIZE(options)] = { };
> char *value, *buf = NULL;
> struct utsname utsn;
> char path[PATH_MAX];
> size_t i, n;
> ssize_t ret;
> - FILE *fd;
> + FILE *fd = NULL;
> + bool is_pipe = false;
Reverse-Christmas-tree style please.
>
> if (uname(&utsn))
> - goto no_config;
> + goto end_parse;
Just thinking, maybe if uname() fails we can skip /boot/config-$(uname
-r) but still attempt to parse /proc/config{,.gz} instead of printing
only NULL options?
>
> snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/boot/config-%s", utsn.release);
>
> fd = fopen(path, "r");
> if (!fd && errno == ENOENT) {
> - /* Some distributions put the config file at /proc/config, give
> - * it a try.
> - * Sometimes it is also at /proc/config.gz but we do not try
> - * this one for now, it would require linking against libz.
> + /* Some distributions build with CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y and put the
> + * config file at /proc/config.gz. We try to invoke an external
> + * gzip program to avoid linking to libz.
> + * Hide stderr to avoid interference with the JSON output.
Because some distributions do use /proc/config, we should keep this. You
can probably add /proc/config.gz as another attempt below (or even
above) the current case?
> */
> - fd = fopen("/proc/config", "r");
> + fd = popen("gunzip -c /proc/config.gz 2>/dev/null", "r");
> + is_pipe = true;
> }
> if (!fd) {
> p_info("skipping kernel config, can't open file: %s",
> strerror(errno));
> - goto no_config;
> + goto end_parse;
> }
> /* Sanity checks */
> ret = getline(&buf, &n, fd);
> @@ -418,27 +421,36 @@ static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
> if (!buf || !ret) {
> p_info("skipping kernel config, can't read from file: %s",
> strerror(errno));
> - free(buf);
> - goto no_config;
> + goto end_parse;
> }
> if (strcmp(buf, "# Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.\n")) {
> p_info("skipping kernel config, can't find correct file");
> - free(buf);
> - goto no_config;
> + goto end_parse;
> + }
> +
> + while (get_kernel_config_option(fd, &buf, &n, &value))> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(options); i++) {
> + if (values[i] || strcmp(buf, options[i]))
Can we have an option set multiple times in the config file? If so,
maybe have a p_info() if values are different to warn users that
conflicting values were found?
(Reading the file just once is a nice improvement over my version, by
the way, thanks!)
> + continue;
> +
> + values[i] = strdup(value);
> + }
> + }
> +
> +end_parse:
> + if (fd) {
> + if (is_pipe) {
> + if (pclose(fd))
> + p_info("failed to read /proc/config.gz");
> + } else
> + fclose(fd);
Please use braces on all branches of the conditional statement (else).
Thanks,
Quentin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tools: bpftool: fix reading from /proc/config.gz
2019-08-05 0:15 [PATCH] tools: bpftool: fix reading from /proc/config.gz Peter Wu
2019-08-05 10:41 ` Quentin Monnet
@ 2019-08-05 15:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-05 19:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2019-08-05 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Wu
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, netdev, Stanislav Fomichev,
Jakub Kicinski, Quentin Monnet
On 08/05, Peter Wu wrote:
> /proc/config has never existed as far as I can see, but /proc/config.gz
> is present on Arch Linux. Execute an external gunzip program to avoid
> linking to zlib and rework the option scanning code since a pipe is not
> seekable. This also fixes a file handle leak on some error paths.
Thanks for doing that! One question: why not link against -lz instead?
With fork/execing gunzip you're just hiding this dependency.
You can add something like this to the Makefile:
ifeq ($(feature-zlib),1)
CLFAGS += -DHAVE_ZLIB
endif
And then conditionally add support for config.gz. Thoughts?
>
> Fixes: 4567b983f78c ("tools: bpftool: add probes for kernel configuration options")
> Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
> ---
> tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> index d672d9086fff..e9e10f582047 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
> @@ -284,34 +284,34 @@ static void probe_jit_limit(void)
> }
> }
>
> -static char *get_kernel_config_option(FILE *fd, const char *option)
> +static bool get_kernel_config_option(FILE *fd, char **buf_p, size_t *n_p,
> + char **value)
> {
> - size_t line_n = 0, optlen = strlen(option);
> - char *res, *strval, *line = NULL;
> - ssize_t n;
> + char *sep;
> + ssize_t linelen;
>
> - rewind(fd);
> - while ((n = getline(&line, &line_n, fd)) > 0) {
> - if (strncmp(line, option, optlen))
> + while ((linelen = getline(buf_p, n_p, fd)) > 0) {
> + char *line = *buf_p;
> + if (strncmp(line, "CONFIG_", 7))
> continue;
> - /* Check we have at least '=', value, and '\n' */
> - if (strlen(line) < optlen + 3)
> - continue;
> - if (*(line + optlen) != '=')
> +
> + sep = memchr(line, '=', linelen);
> + if (!sep)
> continue;
>
> /* Trim ending '\n' */
> - line[strlen(line) - 1] = '\0';
> + line[linelen - 1] = '\0';
> +
> + /* Split on '=' and ensure that a value is present. */
> + *sep = '\0';
> + if (!sep[1])
> + continue;
>
> - /* Copy and return config option value */
> - strval = line + optlen + 1;
> - res = strdup(strval);
> - free(line);
> - return res;
> + *value = sep + 1;
> + return true;
> }
> - free(line);
>
> - return NULL;
> + return false;
> }
>
> static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
> @@ -386,31 +386,34 @@ static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
> /* test_bpf module for BPF tests */
> "CONFIG_TEST_BPF",
> };
> + char *values[ARRAY_SIZE(options)] = { };
> char *value, *buf = NULL;
> struct utsname utsn;
> char path[PATH_MAX];
> size_t i, n;
> ssize_t ret;
> - FILE *fd;
> + FILE *fd = NULL;
> + bool is_pipe = false;
>
> if (uname(&utsn))
> - goto no_config;
> + goto end_parse;
>
> snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/boot/config-%s", utsn.release);
>
> fd = fopen(path, "r");
> if (!fd && errno == ENOENT) {
> - /* Some distributions put the config file at /proc/config, give
> - * it a try.
> - * Sometimes it is also at /proc/config.gz but we do not try
> - * this one for now, it would require linking against libz.
> + /* Some distributions build with CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y and put the
> + * config file at /proc/config.gz. We try to invoke an external
> + * gzip program to avoid linking to libz.
> + * Hide stderr to avoid interference with the JSON output.
> */
> - fd = fopen("/proc/config", "r");
> + fd = popen("gunzip -c /proc/config.gz 2>/dev/null", "r");
> + is_pipe = true;
> }
> if (!fd) {
> p_info("skipping kernel config, can't open file: %s",
> strerror(errno));
> - goto no_config;
> + goto end_parse;
> }
> /* Sanity checks */
> ret = getline(&buf, &n, fd);
> @@ -418,27 +421,36 @@ static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
> if (!buf || !ret) {
> p_info("skipping kernel config, can't read from file: %s",
> strerror(errno));
> - free(buf);
> - goto no_config;
> + goto end_parse;
> }
> if (strcmp(buf, "# Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.\n")) {
> p_info("skipping kernel config, can't find correct file");
> - free(buf);
> - goto no_config;
> + goto end_parse;
> + }
> +
> + while (get_kernel_config_option(fd, &buf, &n, &value)) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(options); i++) {
> + if (values[i] || strcmp(buf, options[i]))
> + continue;
> +
> + values[i] = strdup(value);
> + }
> + }
> +
> +end_parse:
> + if (fd) {
> + if (is_pipe) {
> + if (pclose(fd))
> + p_info("failed to read /proc/config.gz");
> + } else
> + fclose(fd);
> }
> free(buf);
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(options); i++) {
> - value = get_kernel_config_option(fd, options[i]);
> - print_kernel_option(options[i], value);
> - free(value);
> + print_kernel_option(options[i], values[i]);
> + free(values[i]);
> }
> - fclose(fd);
> - return;
> -
> -no_config:
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(options); i++)
> - print_kernel_option(options[i], NULL);
> }
>
> static bool probe_bpf_syscall(const char *define_prefix)
> --
> 2.22.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tools: bpftool: fix reading from /proc/config.gz
2019-08-05 15:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
@ 2019-08-05 19:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-05 23:54 ` Peter Wu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2019-08-05 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stanislav Fomichev
Cc: Peter Wu, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, netdev,
Stanislav Fomichev, Quentin Monnet
On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 08:29:36 -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 08/05, Peter Wu wrote:
> > /proc/config has never existed as far as I can see, but /proc/config.gz
> > is present on Arch Linux. Execute an external gunzip program to avoid
> > linking to zlib and rework the option scanning code since a pipe is not
> > seekable. This also fixes a file handle leak on some error paths.
> Thanks for doing that! One question: why not link against -lz instead?
> With fork/execing gunzip you're just hiding this dependency.
>
> You can add something like this to the Makefile:
> ifeq ($(feature-zlib),1)
> CLFAGS += -DHAVE_ZLIB
> endif
>
> And then conditionally add support for config.gz. Thoughts?
+1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tools: bpftool: fix reading from /proc/config.gz
2019-08-05 19:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2019-08-05 23:54 ` Peter Wu
2019-08-06 9:36 ` Quentin Monnet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Wu @ 2019-08-05 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, netdev,
Stanislav Fomichev, Quentin Monnet
Hi all,
Thank you for your quick feedback, I will address them in the next
revision.
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 11:41:09AM +0100, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> As far as I understood (from examining Cilium [0]), /proc/config _is_
> used by some distributions, such as CoreOS. This is why we look at that
> location in bpftool.
>
> [0] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/blob/master/bpf/run_probes.sh#L42
This comment[1] says "CoreOS uses /proc/config", but I think that is a
typo and is supposed to say "/proc/config.gz". The original feature
request[2] uses "/boot/config" as example.
[1]: https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/1065
[2]: https://github.com/cilium/cilium/issues/891
Given that "/proc/config.gz" is the standard since at least v2.6.12-rc2,
and the official kernel has no mention of "/proc/config", I would like
to skip the latter. If someone has a need for this and it is not covered
by either /boot/config-$(uname -r) or /proc/config.gz, they could submit
a patch for it with links to documentation. How about that?
> > -static char *get_kernel_config_option(FILE *fd, const char *option)
> > +static bool get_kernel_config_option(FILE *fd, char **buf_p, size_t *n_p,
> > + char **value)
>
> Maybe we could rename this function, and have "next" appear in it
> somewhere? After your changes, it does not return the value for a
> specific option anymore.
I have changed it to "read_next_kernel_config_option", let me know if
you prefer an alternative.
> > {
> > - size_t line_n = 0, optlen = strlen(option);
> > - char *res, *strval, *line = NULL;
> > - ssize_t n;
> > + char *sep;
> > + ssize_t linelen;
>
> Please order the declarations in reverse-Christmas tree style.
Does this refer to the type, name, or full line length? I did not find
this in CodingStyle, the closest I could get is:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/732076/
I will assume the line length for now.
> > static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
> > @@ -386,31 +386,34 @@ static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
> > /* test_bpf module for BPF tests */
> > "CONFIG_TEST_BPF",
> > };
> > + char *values[ARRAY_SIZE(options)] = { };
> > char *value, *buf = NULL;
> > struct utsname utsn;
> > char path[PATH_MAX];
> > size_t i, n;
> > ssize_t ret;
> > - FILE *fd;
> > + FILE *fd = NULL;
> > + bool is_pipe = false;
>
> Reverse-Christmas-tree style please.
Even if that means moving lines? Something like this?
char path[PATH_MAX];
+ bool is_pipe = false;
+ FILE *fd = NULL;
size_t i, n;
ssize_t ret;
- FILE *fd;
> > if (uname(&utsn))
> > - goto no_config;
> > + goto end_parse;
>
> Just thinking, maybe if uname() fails we can skip /boot/config-$(uname
> -r) but still attempt to parse /proc/config{,.gz} instead of printing
> only NULL options?
Good idea, I'll try a bit harder if uname falls for whatever reason.
> Because some distributions do use /proc/config, we should keep this. You
> can probably add /proc/config.gz as another attempt below (or even
> above) the current case?
I doubt it is actually in use, it looks like a typo in the original PR.
This post only lists /proc/config.gz, /boot/config and
/boot/config-$(uname -r): https://superuser.com/questions/287371
> > + while (get_kernel_config_option(fd, &buf, &n, &value))> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(options); i++) {
> > + if (values[i] || strcmp(buf, options[i]))
>
> Can we have an option set multiple times in the config file? If so,
> maybe have a p_info() if values are different to warn users that
> conflicting values were found?
scripts/kconfig/merge_config.sh seems to apply a merge strategy,
overwriting earlier values and warning about it. However this should be
rare given that it ended up at /proc/config.gz. For now I will favor
simplicity over complexity and keep the old situation. Let me know if
you prefer otherwise.
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 12:06:49PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 08:29:36 -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 08/05, Peter Wu wrote:
> > > /proc/config has never existed as far as I can see, but /proc/config.gz
> > > is present on Arch Linux. Execute an external gunzip program to avoid
> > > linking to zlib and rework the option scanning code since a pipe is not
> > > seekable. This also fixes a file handle leak on some error paths.
> > Thanks for doing that! One question: why not link against -lz instead?
> > With fork/execing gunzip you're just hiding this dependency.
> >
> > You can add something like this to the Makefile:
> > ifeq ($(feature-zlib),1)
> > CLFAGS += -DHAVE_ZLIB
> > endif
> >
> > And then conditionally add support for config.gz. Thoughts?
>
> +1
Given that the old code did not have this library dependency I did not
add it (the program would otherwise fail to run). Executing an external
process is similar to what tar does. I will look into linking directly
to zlib, thanks!
--
Kind regards,
Peter Wu
https://lekensteyn.nl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tools: bpftool: fix reading from /proc/config.gz
2019-08-05 23:54 ` Peter Wu
@ 2019-08-06 9:36 ` Quentin Monnet
2019-08-06 15:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Monnet @ 2019-08-06 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Wu
Cc: Jakub Kicinski, Stanislav Fomichev, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, netdev, Stanislav Fomichev
Hi Peter,
2019-08-06 00:54 UTC+0100 ~ Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you for your quick feedback, I will address them in the next
> revision.
>
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 11:41:09AM +0100, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>
>> As far as I understood (from examining Cilium [0]), /proc/config _is_
>> used by some distributions, such as CoreOS. This is why we look at that
>> location in bpftool.
>>
>> [0] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/blob/master/bpf/run_probes.sh#L42
>
> This comment[1] says "CoreOS uses /proc/config", but I think that is a
> typo and is supposed to say "/proc/config.gz". The original feature
> request[2] uses "/boot/config" as example.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/cilium/cilium/pull/1065
> [2]: https://github.com/cilium/cilium/issues/891
>
> Given that "/proc/config.gz" is the standard since at least v2.6.12-rc2,
> and the official kernel has no mention of "/proc/config", I would like
> to skip the latter. If someone has a need for this and it is not covered
> by either /boot/config-$(uname -r) or /proc/config.gz, they could submit
> a patch for it with links to documentation. How about that?
Ok, did a bit of research on my side as well, and I couldn't find a
solid reference to /proc/config either, so it seems you are correct.
Let's drop /proc/config for now. Thanks for investigating that!
>
>>> -static char *get_kernel_config_option(FILE *fd, const char *option)
>>> +static bool get_kernel_config_option(FILE *fd, char **buf_p, size_t *n_p,
>>> + char **value)
>>
>> Maybe we could rename this function, and have "next" appear in it
>> somewhere? After your changes, it does not return the value for a
>> specific option anymore.
>
> I have changed it to "read_next_kernel_config_option", let me know if
> you prefer an alternative.
>
Sounds good to me.
>>> {
>>> - size_t line_n = 0, optlen = strlen(option);
>>> - char *res, *strval, *line = NULL;
>>> - ssize_t n;
>>> + char *sep;
>>> + ssize_t linelen;
>>
>> Please order the declarations in reverse-Christmas tree style.
>
> Does this refer to the type, name, or full line length? I did not find
> this in CodingStyle, the closest I could get is:
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/732076/
>
> I will assume the line length for now.
I am unsure this is in the CodingStyle, but fairly certain that this is
a convention for at least network-related code. And yes, as I understand
it refers to the length of the line.
>
>>> static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
>>> @@ -386,31 +386,34 @@ static void probe_kernel_image_config(void)
>>> /* test_bpf module for BPF tests */
>>> "CONFIG_TEST_BPF",
>>> };
>>> + char *values[ARRAY_SIZE(options)] = { };
>>> char *value, *buf = NULL;
>>> struct utsname utsn;
>>> char path[PATH_MAX];
>>> size_t i, n;
>>> ssize_t ret;
>>> - FILE *fd;
>>> + FILE *fd = NULL;
>>> + bool is_pipe = false;
>>
>> Reverse-Christmas-tree style please.
>
> Even if that means moving lines? Something like this?
>
> char path[PATH_MAX];
> + bool is_pipe = false;
> + FILE *fd = NULL;
> size_t i, n;
> ssize_t ret;
> - FILE *fd;
Yes, that's the idea (although "is_pipe" should be at the top in that
case, above "path" -- and this applies to your v2 patch, by the way).
>
>>> if (uname(&utsn))
>>> - goto no_config;
>>> + goto end_parse;
>>
>> Just thinking, maybe if uname() fails we can skip /boot/config-$(uname
>> -r) but still attempt to parse /proc/config{,.gz} instead of printing
>> only NULL options?
>
> Good idea, I'll try a bit harder if uname falls for whatever reason.
Thanks!
>
>> Because some distributions do use /proc/config, we should keep this. You
>> can probably add /proc/config.gz as another attempt below (or even
>> above) the current case?
>
> I doubt it is actually in use, it looks like a typo in the original PR.
> This post only lists /proc/config.gz, /boot/config and
> /boot/config-$(uname -r): https://superuser.com/questions/287371
>
>>> + while (get_kernel_config_option(fd, &buf, &n, &value))
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(options); i++) {
>>> + if (values[i] || strcmp(buf, options[i]))
>>
>> Can we have an option set multiple times in the config file? If so,
>> maybe have a p_info() if values are different to warn users that
>> conflicting values were found?
>
> scripts/kconfig/merge_config.sh seems to apply a merge strategy,
> overwriting earlier values and warning about it. However this should be
> rare given that it ended up at /proc/config.gz. For now I will favor
> simplicity over complexity and keep the old situation. Let me know if
> you prefer otherwise.
Understood, let's keep it that way for now.
Thanks,
Quentin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tools: bpftool: fix reading from /proc/config.gz
2019-08-06 9:36 ` Quentin Monnet
@ 2019-08-06 15:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2019-08-06 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Quentin Monnet
Cc: Peter Wu, Jakub Kicinski, Stanislav Fomichev, Alexei Starovoitov,
Daniel Borkmann, Network Development, Stanislav Fomichev
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:36 AM Quentin Monnet
<quentin.monnet@netronome.com> wrote:
>
> >>> {
> >>> - size_t line_n = 0, optlen = strlen(option);
> >>> - char *res, *strval, *line = NULL;
> >>> - ssize_t n;
> >>> + char *sep;
> >>> + ssize_t linelen;
> >>
> >> Please order the declarations in reverse-Christmas tree style.
> >
> > Does this refer to the type, name, or full line length? I did not find
> > this in CodingStyle, the closest I could get is:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/732076/
> >
> > I will assume the line length for now.
>
> I am unsure this is in the CodingStyle, but fairly certain that this is
> a convention for at least network-related code. And yes, as I understand
> it refers to the length of the line.
Let's not over focus on this.
It's a preference, but not a strong requirement.
There are plenty of cases where it shouldn't be followed.
Like logical grouping of variables take precedence of xmas tree.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-06 15:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-05 0:15 [PATCH] tools: bpftool: fix reading from /proc/config.gz Peter Wu
2019-08-05 10:41 ` Quentin Monnet
2019-08-05 15:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-05 19:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-05 23:54 ` Peter Wu
2019-08-06 9:36 ` Quentin Monnet
2019-08-06 15:27 ` Alexei Starovoitov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).