From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@netronome.com>,
Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>,
oss-drivers@netronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] nfp: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 19:00:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190806170049.GA12269@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190806095008.57007f2f@cakuba.netronome.com>
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:50:08AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:11:19 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > never do something different based on this.
> >
> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
> > Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@netronome.com>
> > Cc: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
> > Cc: oss-drivers@netronome.com
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
>
> I take it this is the case since commit ff9fb72bc077 ("debugfs: return
> error values, not NULL")? I.e. v5.0? It'd be useful to know for backport
> purposes.
You were always safe to ignore debugfs calls before that, but in 5.0 and
then 5.2 we got a bit more "robust" with some internal debugfs logic to
make it even easier. These can be backported to 2.6.11+ if you really
want to, no functionality should change.
But why would you want to backport them? This really isn't a "bugfix"
for a stable kernel. No one should ever noticed the difference except
for less memory being used.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-06 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-06 16:11 [PATCH 00/17] Networking driver debugfs cleanups Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 01/17] wimax: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 02/17] bonding: no need to print a message if debugfs_create_dir() fails Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 03/17] mlx5: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 19:41 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-06 19:47 ` gregkh
2019-08-06 20:37 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 04/17] xgbe: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:28 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 05/17] bnxt: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 06/17] cxgb4: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 07/17] hns3: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 08/17] nfp: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-06 17:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2019-08-06 17:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 09/17] stmmac: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 10/17] dpaa2: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 11/17] qca: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-08 6:30 ` Michael Heimpold
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 12/17] skge: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 17:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 13/17] mvpp2: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 14/17] fm10k: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 15/17] i40e: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 16/17] ixgbe: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 16:11 ` [PATCH 17/17] ieee802154: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-06 19:22 ` Stefan Schmidt
2019-08-06 19:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-09 1:37 ` [PATCH 00/17] Networking driver debugfs cleanups David Miller
2019-08-09 1:42 ` David Miller
2019-08-09 12:30 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190806170049.GA12269@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edwin.peer@netronome.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
--cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
--cc=tiny.windzz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).