Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/8] netfilter: header compilation fixes

[Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>]

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 03:16:57PM +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> A number of netfilter header files are on the header-test blacklist
> becuse they cannot be compiled stand-alone.   There are two main reasons
> for this: missing inclusions of other headers, and missing conditionals
> checking for CONFIG_* symbols.
> 
> The first six of these patches rectify these omissions, the seventh
> removes some unnecessary "#ifdef __KERNEL__" checks, and the last
> removes all the NF headers from the blacklist.
> 
> I've cc'ed Masahiro Yamada because the last patch removes 74 lines from
> include/Kbuild and may conflict with his kbuild tree.

Series applied, one comment below.

> Jeremy Sowden (8):
>   netfilter: inlined four headers files into another one.
>   netfilter: added missing includes to a number of header-files.
>   netfilter: added missing IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER) checks to
>     header-file.
>   netfilter: added missing IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_TABLES) check to
>     header-file.
>   netfilter: added missing IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) checks to
>     some header-files.
>   netfilter: added missing IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER) checks to some
>     header-files.
>   netfilter: removed "#ifdef __KERNEL__" guards from some headers.
>   kbuild: removed all netfilter headers from header-test blacklist.

Would you mind if - before pushing this out - I do this string
replacement for the patch subject?

s/added/add
s/removed/remove
s/inlined/inline

I was told present tense is preferred for description. Otherwise, I'll
leave them as is.

Thanks.