From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585C1C3A5A2 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB112070D for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Xl6gvk/w" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727464AbfHSOqi (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:46:38 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com ([209.85.160.193]:32872 "EHLO mail-qt1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725536AbfHSOqh (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:46:37 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id v38so2166913qtb.0; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 07:46:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vgFQFQ3GZPjYMyP+LOQm1u/Kt9yQ5YLSm11v3IXc8GM=; b=Xl6gvk/wTATqgt1ygrQa4YZhgb2Nm2tnej3thVYUfjlvBENSqG2yJRVdqxZg5FLTQY cHaF24KkE4e3Zanms4IZB5urXI0TABhVTFZ+iSnvBeG6JmA+Wu8f6ao4ituMP3R9d0MU ciyw7aZeD7h1hzJTAKjtRJkfcSOmBzYm3VsC/HNdoVZASRLVj3S4vBf6AXUVz39uDIwd i8SBbV3RuluFaqjdMYlBdhR/N0WJjoRUKsSIALFgB9c7ZfLjtqj03svd3ZtgxXhltcKe svvOK3wQKfO6LUTZVT6jRXSKTZHEootyBU73qfv4I+n3326Y00qE4PaFPIRGlHMjH6yM U46g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vgFQFQ3GZPjYMyP+LOQm1u/Kt9yQ5YLSm11v3IXc8GM=; b=EAniLKGXVlAF0kzDw54oG/iAYNYbGyWe8runoGylxcXAQdGvEuJsLMKFSZioVeL335 CeIMzRhfkkiYBuxITsBqM6bdg6p4WQ2OPnd7+A8QM0tjNX0Yu3evmd3exTX9pXOH7dFD fGHLjmTSIVCh8WuWPhRfNylNDY+/JB/M0yAHwgxioukcDiEuTO+gz4GRALWWVqzJLq+r N90fyXJiEzuT77PJPmfAQX7kPes44d5wSuhZJYbpbbgQinMlwQwBGvzAEgNvqDXYDiNz AsKKpkWZuG5bGAgPp8Z789SOA5AFp4GnEKE7cK54iEFxhjIzW+zyxhnG+TxrDWsuoMsL hcYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVP7xT34AXDFZqX+kOpZJD7d8ehxc0pPiSKawVgKY7nKF8DTxm3 YIFCqkkrb71zKMli+XXe9Kg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxn9an7pkjrZAjjSZwkPHrqfOcKdc01svcSd6iAUirRf7eprwpHXa4akG0dwK9Og06HXOLj8w== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7354:: with SMTP id q20mr20679419qtp.60.1566225996461; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 07:46:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([168.181.49.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f23sm6940635qkk.80.2019.08.19.07.46.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 07:46:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 586F9C1F09; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:46:33 -0300 (-03) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:46:33 -0300 From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner To: Xin Long Cc: network dev , linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, Neil Horman , davem Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] sctp: add SCTP_ASCONF_SUPPORTED sockopt Message-ID: <20190819144633.GD2870@localhost.localdomain> References: <20190819143052.GC2870@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:43:03PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:30 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:02:46PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > > > SCTP_ASCONF_SUPPORTED sockopt is used to set enpoint's asconf > > > flag. With this feature, each endpoint will have its own flag > > > for its future asoc's asconf_capable, instead of netns asconf > > > flag. > > > > Is this backed by a RFC? If yes, it should be noted in the patch > > description. > > Quickly searching, I found only FreeBSD references. > RFC doesn't define this sockopt clearly, unlike prsctp and reconfig, > not sure why. > but BSD supports it, so does some userland SCTP. Ok. Thanks.