From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: f.fainelli@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
idosch@idosch.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: dsa: tag_8021q: Future-proof the reserved fields in the custom VID
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 02:59:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190820000002.9776-2-olteanv@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190820000002.9776-1-olteanv@gmail.com>
After witnessing the discussion in https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/14/151
w.r.t. ioctl extensibility, it became clear that such an issue might
prevent that the 3 RSV bits inside the DSA 802.1Q tag might also suffer
the same fate and be useless for further extension.
So clearly specify that the reserved bits should currently be
transmitted as zero and ignored on receive. The DSA tagger already does
this (and has always did), and is the only known user so far (no
Wireshark dissection plugin, etc). So there should be no incompatibility
to speak of.
Fixes: 0471dd429cea ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: Create a stable binary format")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
---
net/dsa/tag_8021q.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_8021q.c b/net/dsa/tag_8021q.c
index 6ebbd799c4eb..67a1bc635a7b 100644
--- a/net/dsa/tag_8021q.c
+++ b/net/dsa/tag_8021q.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
*
* RSV - VID[9]:
* To be used for further expansion of SWITCH_ID or for other purposes.
+ * Must be transmitted as zero and ignored on receive.
*
* SWITCH_ID - VID[8:6]:
* Index of switch within DSA tree. Must be between 0 and
@@ -35,6 +36,7 @@
*
* RSV - VID[5:4]:
* To be used for further expansion of PORT or for other purposes.
+ * Must be transmitted as zero and ignored on receive.
*
* PORT - VID[3:0]:
* Index of switch port. Must be between 0 and DSA_MAX_PORTS - 1.
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-19 23:59 [PATCH net-next 0/6] Dynamic toggling of vlan_filtering for SJA1105 DSA Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-19 23:59 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2019-08-20 3:16 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: dsa: tag_8021q: Future-proof the reserved fields in the custom VID Florian Fainelli
2019-08-19 23:59 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] net: bridge: Populate the pvid flag in br_vlan_get_info Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 0:12 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2019-08-19 23:59 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: dsa: Delete the VID from the upstream port as well Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 5:51 ` Vivien Didelot
2019-08-20 9:54 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 17:52 ` Vivien Didelot
2019-08-20 19:40 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-08-20 20:40 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 20:58 ` Vivien Didelot
2019-08-20 21:02 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 21:36 ` Vivien Didelot
2019-08-20 22:09 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-21 3:30 ` Vivien Didelot
2019-08-21 9:51 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 0:00 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: dsa: Don't program the VLAN as pvid on the upstream port Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 3:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-08-20 12:09 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 22:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-08-20 6:07 ` Vivien Didelot
2019-08-20 10:22 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 0:00 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: dsa: Allow proper internal use of VLANs Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 3:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-08-20 0:00 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] net: dsa: tag_8021q: Restore bridge pvid when enabling vlan_filtering Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 3:32 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-08-20 10:28 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-08-20 17:36 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-08-20 23:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-08-20 8:04 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] Dynamic toggling of vlan_filtering for SJA1105 DSA Vivien Didelot
2019-08-20 10:18 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190820000002.9776-2-olteanv@gmail.com \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).