From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B6EC3A589 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E1D22D6D for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="G1apOVnx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730845AbfHTU6Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:58:16 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f196.google.com ([209.85.222.196]:40951 "EHLO mail-qk1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730798AbfHTU6Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:58:16 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f196.google.com with SMTP id s145so5745774qke.7 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:58:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SqLWJh0GResoA/2lcZM6Nsi3D2dP60lqXx/h+Yc5Tso=; b=G1apOVnxha95rns3MpqVTl+QjHyTHzDR8E4K0dLCccQT+VdZWnCZa3ZpopMffW5TX4 zYkPbUhj8PQRbOsJf/XjtWDyZVyGvG+imsIMv46QTLMgLDJEgR9AO44XTWMly63hzAMs a7H66mrabNiv2cQtyXTTQgSplvnFTyFQoWhcPo5c7n05126iOZFwCZXTeNx4+ZaHaKNc eNQjQZR0U6UcidR0INE7N6J0J/1uHJJN5AIQrBYAyXOfap/dKn8s99BddQJaHebmqcxM DZI6EtzLe+7PGPIgYd3iIjqkf1Z95lSGlQuWxaEZuw84KO2Stm2wglqZDzvTfdUpqrl0 ZZRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SqLWJh0GResoA/2lcZM6Nsi3D2dP60lqXx/h+Yc5Tso=; b=kkwnve9XkAF17w0aWDKGGJVSLflO5Wkg6CU7UZKQn/Uj2mK+6/EUz3iyn9BGjbNXBK S3KFSxyTVa71j/Dyd6MD7yyB+75iSXqj5wS5uHv2RDxhAqDVUqR1mhEaxecdXhIE3WzB K00IxqpJAdK9706sJKLVmklZOqmi+36eLYOjF3zkZAvRB94EHyjYiuCqsWifFXJ8mjlE F9M+no1YrD4pnB9VPJE1RFMC6KtxX7cqZ7dSGNYtAaaDwXj2XA01pz6K3GBVq1FyRPdJ r34mLFskWL4x9Fe0kWxcZ4uG1P4uVko5EtjOcPbpU/NGnr678tC31oVHawREa0tPEDpJ RBDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVCeSCC9oaiCWNvJFXg1LfnEg8T7m6T7Q6RfHERbb5l3jgD5AAc P/08wNXoq9qB2C/B3tT7FgYFe24y7p4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhwJUCX9XhpN061LSXqQGBR9svGeblYQn7ct4kCFMCz/7r3D3ozxqo4ZBP215McLlOTKDkhQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:a6d8:: with SMTP id p207mr25382452qke.387.1566334695375; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (mtrlpq2853w-lp130-05-67-70-100-98.dsl.bell.ca. [67.70.100.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x14sm8738599qkj.95.2019.08.20.13.58.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:58:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20190820165813.GB8523@t480s.localdomain> From: Vivien Didelot To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn , Ido Schimmel , Roopa Prabhu , nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, "David S. Miller" , netdev Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: dsa: Delete the VID from the upstream port as well In-Reply-To: References: <20190820000002.9776-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <20190820000002.9776-4-olteanv@gmail.com> <20190820015138.GB975@t480s.localdomain> <20190820135213.GB11752@t480s.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 23:40:34 +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > I don't need this patch. I'm not sure what my thought process was at > the time I added it to the patchset. > I'm still interested in getting rid of the vlan bitmap through other > means (picking up your old changeset). Could you take a look at my > questions in that thread? I'm not sure I understand what the user > interaction is supposed to look like for configuring CPU/DSA ports. What do you mean by getting rid of the vlan bitmap? What do you need exactly?