netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
To: <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf: introduce verifier internal test flag
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 22:52:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190823055215.2658669-2-ast@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190823055215.2658669-1-ast@kernel.org>

Introduce BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ flag to stress test parentage chain
and state pruning.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 1 +
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h     | 3 +++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c         | 1 +
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 5 ++++-
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 5fe99f322b1c..26a6d58ca78c 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env {
 	struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *head; /* stack of verifier states to be processed */
 	int stack_size;			/* number of states to be processed */
 	bool strict_alignment;		/* perform strict pointer alignment checks */
+	bool test_state_freq;		/* test verifier with different pruning frequency */
 	struct bpf_verifier_state *cur_state; /* current verifier state */
 	struct bpf_verifier_state_list **explored_states; /* search pruning optimization */
 	struct bpf_verifier_state_list *free_list;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index b5889257cc33..5d2fb183ee2d 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -285,6 +285,9 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {
  */
 #define BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32	(1U << 2)
 
+/* The verifier internal test flag. Behavior is undefined */
+#define BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ	(1U << 3)
+
 /* When BPF ldimm64's insn[0].src_reg != 0 then this can have
  * two extensions:
  *
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index c0f62fd67c6b..ca60eafa6922 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1629,6 +1629,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 
 	if (attr->prog_flags & ~(BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT |
 				 BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT |
+				 BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ |
 				 BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 16d66bd7af09..3fb50757e812 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7223,7 +7223,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
 	struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl, **pprev;
 	struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state, *new;
 	int i, j, err, states_cnt = 0;
-	bool add_new_state = false;
+	bool add_new_state = env->test_state_freq ? true : false;
 
 	cur->last_insn_idx = env->prev_insn_idx;
 	if (!env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].prune_point)
@@ -9263,6 +9263,9 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
 
 	env->allow_ptr_leaks = is_priv;
 
+	if (is_priv)
+		env->test_state_freq = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ;
+
 	ret = replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(env);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto skip_full_check;
-- 
2.20.0


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-23  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-23  5:52 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: precision tracking tests Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-23  5:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2019-08-26  5:09   ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf: introduce verifier internal test flag Song Liu
2019-08-23  5:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] tools/bpf: sync bpf.h Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-26  5:10   ` Song Liu
2019-08-23  5:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] selftests/bpf: verifier precise tests Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-26  5:22   ` Song Liu
2019-08-26 22:47     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-26 22:51       ` Song Liu
2019-08-23  5:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: add precision tracking test Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-26  5:33   ` Song Liu
2019-08-27 22:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: precision tracking tests Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190823055215.2658669-2-ast@kernel.org \
    --to=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).