From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 4/8] net/mlx5e: Add device out of buffer counter
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 11:16:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190823111601.012fabf4@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27f7cfa13d1b5e7717e2d75595ab453951b18a96.camel@mellanox.com>
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 06:00:45 +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 18:33 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 23:35:52 +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > From: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@mellanox.com>
> > >
> > > Added the following packets drop counter:
> > > Device out of buffer - counts packets which were dropped due to
> > > full
> > > device internal receive queue.
> > > This counter will be shown on ethtool as a new counter called
> > > dev_out_of_buffer.
> > > The counter is read from FW by command QUERY_VNIC_ENV.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@mellanox.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
> >
> > Sounds like rx_fifo_errors, no? Doesn't rx_fifo_errors count RX
> > overruns?
>
> No, that is port buffer you are looking for and we got that fully
> covered in mlx5. this is different.
>
> This new counter is deep into the HW data path pipeline and it covers
> very rare and complex scenarios that got only recently introduced with
> swichdev mode and "some" lately added tunnels offloads that are routed
> between VFs/PFs.
>
> Normally the HW is lossless once the packet passes port buffers into
> the data plane pipeline, let's call that "fast lane", BUT for sriov
> configurations with switchdev mode enabled and some special hand
> crafted tc tunnel offloads that requires hairpin between VFs/PFs, the
> hw might decide to send some traffic to a "service lane" which is still
> fast path but unlike the "fast lane" it handles traffic through "HW
> internal" receive and send queues (just like we do with hairpin) that
> might drop packets. the whole thing is transparent to driver and it is
> HW implementation specific.
I see thanks for the explanation and sorry for the delayed response.
Would it perhaps make sense to indicate the hairpin in the name?
dev_out_of_buffer is quite a generic name, and there seems to be no
doc, nor does the commit message explains it as well as you have..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-23 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-22 23:35 [pull request][net-next 0/8] Mellanox, mlx5 updates 2019-08-22 Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-22 23:35 ` [net-next 1/8] net/mlx5e: ethtool, Fix a typo in WOL function names Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-22 23:35 ` [net-next 2/8] net/mlx5e: Expose new function for TIS destroy loop Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-22 23:35 ` [net-next 3/8] net/mlx5e: Support LAG TX port affinity distribution Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-22 23:35 ` [net-next 4/8] net/mlx5e: Add device out of buffer counter Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-23 1:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-23 6:00 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-23 18:16 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-08-26 20:14 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-26 20:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-08-26 23:06 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-22 23:35 ` [net-next 5/8] net/mlx5e: Change function's position to a more fitting file Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-22 23:35 ` [net-next 6/8] net/mlx5e: Support RSS for IP-in-IP and IPv6 tunneled packets Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-22 23:35 ` [net-next 7/8] net/mlx5e: Improve stateless offload capability check Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-22 23:35 ` [net-next 8/8] net/mlx5e: Support TSO and TX checksum offloads for IP-in-IP tunnels Saeed Mahameed
2019-08-24 23:31 ` [pull request][net-next 0/8] Mellanox, mlx5 updates 2019-08-22 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190823111601.012fabf4@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=moshe@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox